THE use of technology can be beneficial for children, and parents should treat reports about apparent adverse impacts with caution, according to an academic.
Dr Mark Sprevak, of Edinburgh University, believes there is often little or no evidence for claims, including one report that excessive use of smart-phones could lead to early-onset dementia in teenagers.
The issue is being examined today by Dr Sprevak, part of the Eidyn Research Centre of the University's School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences at a 'Philosophy and the Playground event' at Summerhall, Edinburgh.
He said: "There have been a lot of scary headlines over the years about technology and how it might affect children.
"In each of these cases, once you look at them in more detail, you find that there is not only no evidence for their assertions, but often the evidence is that that technology could actually improve outcomes.
"Texting in many circumstances is correlated with being a better speller, and appropriately using electronic calculators is correlated with being better in learning mental arithmetic.
"There was no peer-reviewed study on the 'digital dementia' report - it was just picked up, there was no hard evidence to back up the claim."
The use of calculators in tests by children aged up to 11 has recently been banned in England. In November 2012 the Westminster education minister Elizabeth Truss said an over-reliance on calculators meant that pupils were not getting the rigorous grounding in mental and written arithmetic that they needed to progress.
Dr Sprevak said reports about adverse impacts of technology "seem to chime with a deep-seated intuition that by relying on some piece of technology, our brain will somehow degenerate".
It comes after the British Chiropractic Association warned that youngsters are putting themselves at risk of neck and back pain by slumping over laptops.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article