A Chinese court has reserved its decision in the trial of two men accused of the murder of a Tibetan Buddhist teacher from Britain.
Choje Akong Tulku Rinpoche was stabbed to death in the Chinese city of Chengdu last October.
The 73-year-old co-founder of the Kagyu Samye Ling Monastery in Eskdalemuir, in the Scottish Borders, was said by police to have been killed in a financial dispute, along with his nephew Loga and assistant Lama Chime Wangyal.
A spokesman for the monastery said that Tudeng Gusha (also known as Thubten Kunsal) and Ciren Banyue, his nephew, were being tried for intentional homicide, while Tudeng's other nephew, Geni Jiangcuo, was on trial for harbouring a criminal.
Reports from China said that Chengdu's Intermediate People's Court was told that Tudeng had come to Akong Rinpoche's house demanding 2.7 million yuan (£270,000).
Tudeng, a sculptor, was demanding payment for a number of statues he had carved during a five-year stay in Scotland and London.
The Buddhist teacher declined to give him the money he was seeking, and after four more fruitless visits, Tudeng brought his nephew Ciren Banyue with him and they stabbed the three victims to death, the court reportedly heard.
A spokesman for the monastery said before the hearing: "We understand that Tudeng Gusha claimed that he was owed money for sculpting work which he had previously done at Kagyu Samye Ling, Scotland and Kagyu Samye Dzong London and that immediately before the murder he demanded money from Akong Rinpoche.
"We have provided the Public Security Bureau with documentary evidence and also witness statements to prove that when Tudeng Gusha was working at Kagyu Samye Ling Scotland and Kagyu Samye Dzong London it was agreed that he would not be paid a salary but that all his expenses would be paid and that no money was owing."
A spokeswoman for lawyers representing the families of the three victims said: "The trial started yesterday and ended this afternoon. The judgement will be pronounced later, on a date to be fixed."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article