COMPANIES and charities that give placements to the unemployed under the UK Government's controversial unpaid work schemes have been granted anonymity.
Protest groups targeting Mandatory Work Activity and other programmes. are being blamed for a decision to keep secret the names of a dwindling band of companies still willing to provide work placements under the flagship employability schemes.
Since the beginning of the year, The Herald has been asking for the names of the companies providing placements in Scotland under the controversial schemes, branded as "forced labour" by protest groups, which require those on benefits to take up voluntary work, unpaid placements or lose their support.
The request was initially turned down on the basis of commercial confidentiality. The Herald challenged the decision on the grounds that similar lists had already been published for the south-east and north-west regions of England, and the decision was therefore hard to justify.
Yesterday, the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) confirmed its initial decision. While admitting its stance appeared inconsistent, the Government said high-profile demonstrations against some of the companies involved had led it to change its position.
In a letter, the department said: "The DWP acknowledges there is a public interest in organisations involved in providing work placements for the work programme; we have in fact released this information following previous FoI [Freedom of Information] requests.
"More recently however, we have become aware of various campaigns aimed at harming the commercial interests of companies involved in delivering the work programme as well as a potentially undermining Government policy.
"For that reason the department will not comply with further FoI requests to release information about companies who provide, or have provided, work placements."
Tom Greatrex, Labour MP for Rutherglen and Hamilton West, said: "It beggars belief the DWP is refusing this information simply because the glare of publicity has brought to light the chaos at the heart of its work experience programme.
"To blame campaign groups for Government failures is clutching at straws. For transparency in government to be obstructed to protect the commercial interests of large companies is wrong. The Government must come clean."
Mark Dunk, of campaign group Right to Work, said: "This is another sign that the Government is more interested in protecting the commercial interests of those involved in making profit off the backs of more than one million unemployed young people in Britain."
The Herald is appealing against the decision to the UK Information Commissioner.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article