The United Nations has been urged to monitor the impact of the UK Government's austerity measures, including its programme of welfare reform.
The Scottish Human Rights Commission, alongside the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission and the Equality and Human Rights Commission, has also asked the UN to scrutinise the UK Government's plan to replace the Human Rights Act with a Bill of Rights.
A joint statement to the UN's Human Rights Council warns of growing concern about the public spending cuts.
"We are concerned by the effect of the economic crisis and austerity measures adopted by the UK Government on (the) enjoyment of human rights in the UK," the statement says.
"We are particularly concerned with their potential effect on women, children, ethnic minorities and disabled people."
It adds: "We recommend the UK Government ensures it respects human rights in budgetary decisions and carefully monitors the impact of policy on disadvantaged groups through equality and human rights impact assessments."
The submission, part of the Universal Periodic Review process under which the UK is examined every four years by the Human Rights Council, comes as the UK Government faces further criticism of its welfare reforms.
The submission also drew the council's attention to the debate about the future of human rights protection in the UK, including calls to repeal the Human Rights Act and create a UK Bill of Rights.
Professor Alan Miller, chairman of the Scottish Human Rights Commission, said the Human Rights Act is an essential legal protection and that international organisations such as the UN should scrutinise and challenge plans to scrap it.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article