According to Gordon Henderson, senior development manager of the Federation of Small Business and a supporter of the Borders Railway, "economists and statisticians could talk you out of anything". The local perspective on the scheme is strongly at variance with the pessimistic view of economic commentators.
Samantha Smith, economic development manager for Borders Council, calls the railway scheme "a game-changer for the local economy" and "one of the most exciting and forward-thinking projects ever to be backed in rural Scotland".
"Scottish Borders and Midlothian have among the lowest GVA [Gross Value Added] levels in Scotland, and we are the only region of the UK which does not have a rail link," she points out.
She details an internal council internal plan for maximising the benefits of the scheme, built around implementation and construction, commuting and inward investment, business growth and the "ripple effects" for tourism and regional marketing. The council is also working with Network Rail to invest an additional £250,000 in station design and connections, and more than £10 million in the redevelopment of Galashiels, including a transport interchange, business space and town centre regeneration.
Smith says: "The development of a new Borders Business Park could bring between 1000-2300 new jobs in high-value professional services.
"Our new tourism strategy aims to use the link to increase visitors linked to the development of assets such as Abbotsford House and the 7stanes mountain biking project."
In the meantime, construction helps local contractors, and has created new apprenticeships and new train driver jobs based at the terminus at Tweedbank.
Smith cites the hard-to-quantify benefits that even critics of the scheme admit exist: "Arguably the biggest benefit will be changed perceptions. The Scottish Borders is often perceived as being remote and 'on the edge' of Scotland. We have stunning landscapes, excellent schools, a skilled workforce, and a fantastic quality of life."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article