THE father of a victim of the Lockerbie bombing has hit out at Scottish authorities over their lack of action, one year on from the publication of a damning book on the case.
Dr Jim Swire, whose daughter Flora was killed in the atrocity, claims the Scottish Government and the Crown Office have completely ignored John Ashton's book, Megrahi: You are my Jury, since its publication on February 28 last year.
The book raises a number of questions about the conviction of Libyan Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al Megrahi. It also includes details of evidence being withheld from his defence team and claims of a discrepancy in the metal analysis of a fragment of circuit board: a key piece of evidence in the case.
Mr Swire has written to the Lord Advocate, First Minister Alex Salmond and Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill, calling for them to take action and accusing them of "intolerable lethargy". He said: "They have completely ignored this book and the evidence it contains. I was horrified to learn the Crown hasn't even approached the scientists who carried out the tests on the circuit fragment.
"It basically means a year's gone by with them doing absolutely nothing."
Mr Swire also repeated his calls for a full inquiry into the alleged failings of the Crown.
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said it is open to the relatives of Megrahi or others with a direct interest in the case to ask for it to be referred back to court for appeal on a posthumous basis."
A Crown Office spokesman said: "As we have stated repeatedly the only appropriate forum for the determination of guilt or innocence is the criminal court. As the investigation remains live, it would not be appropriate to offer further comment."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article