THE British public no longer fit in to just three social classes, a major new study claims.
Instead, the findings suggest people are now divided into seven different classes based on economic, social and cultural measures, the BBC has said.
More than 160,000 people took part in the Great British Class Survey, the largest of its kind in the UK.
The results prompted researchers to dismiss the established upper class, middle class and working class system, traditionally defined by occupation, wealth and education, as too simplistic.
The new classes range from the privileged "elite" to the deprived "precariat", assessing income, savings, house value and social capital – the number and status of people that someone knows.
The research was carried out by Mike Savage from London School of Economics and Fiona Devine from the Manchester University, with the help of experiments website BBC Lab UK.
Ms Devine said: "The study shows there is still a top and a bottom. At the top we still have an elite of very wealthy people and at the bottom the poor, with very little social and cultural engagement."
In the middle are the established middle class, the second wealthiest group, followed by the technical middle class, a small, prosperous group which scores low for social and cultural capital.
Next come new affluent workers, a young class group which is socially and culturally active, with middling levels of economic capital, and the traditional working class, who score low on capital but are not "completely deprived".
Ahead of the poorest are the emergent service workers, a new, young, urban group which is relatively poor but has high social and cultural capital.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article