Earth's biodiversity generally increases as temperatures rise over the long term, but rapid global warming is expected to have the opposite effect, according to Scots scientists.
The increase in the number of species depends on the evolution of new plants and animals over millions of years, research found.
The long timescale necessary for new forms to evolve means that present trends of rising temperatures are unlikely to boost biodiversity, said the scientists from the universities of York, Glasgow and Leeds.
Instead, the current speed of change is expected to cause diversity loss.
Researchers came to the conclusion after analysing fossil and geological records going back 540 million years.
It reverses the findings of a previous study that warm periods in the geological past led to a drop in diversity.
Professor Tim Benton, of the faculty of biological sciences at the University of Leeds, said: "Our results seem to show that temperature improves biodiversity through time as well as across space. However, they do not suggest that current global warming is good for existing species."
Alistair McGowan, of the school of geographical and earth sciences at the University of Glasgow, said: "The previous findings always seemed paradoxical. Ecological studies show that species richness consistently increases towards the equator where it is warm, yet the relationship between biodiversity and temperature through time appeared to be the opposite.
"Our new results reverse these conclusions."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article