Newsnight presenter Jeremy Paxman has laughed off the fuss caused by his beard - saying that he may keep it.
The broadcaster's appearance raised eyebrows on Monday night when he fronted the BBC2 current affairs show with a crop of noticeable new facial hair.
Paxman, 63, said that many at the BBC are pogonophobic - have a fear of beards - but that it was up to him whether he would revert back to his usual appearance or not.
He said: "I have grown a beard for the last few summers, and suddenly wondered whether I really needed to shave it off to present Newsnight.
"Unless you're lucky enough to be Uncle Albert on Only Fools And Horses, Demis Roussos or Abu Hamza, the BBC is generally as pogonophobic as the late-lamented Albanian dictator, Enver Hoxha.
"I may keep it or I may shave it off, but I think I'll make my own decision."
Paxman's appearance sparked comment on Twitter, where the broadcaster's fellow presenter Emily Maitlis tweeted: "Right that's it. I'm working on a moustache for Thursday's Newsnight".
Crime writer Ian Rankin wrote: "It is 1973 and I'm really digging the new album by Paxman's Beard."
Presenter Kirstie Allsopp wrote: "Paxo with a beard is like me going blonde, there are just some things that are not meant to be."
Comedian Jenny Eclair said: "I like Paxman's beard, looks like he might ride a Harley come the weekend."
Comedian Al Murray wrote: "Not seen the Paxman beard or the Perseids (meteor shower). Feel so, so alone."
BBC radio presenter Shelagh Fogarty said: "Mr Paxman's beard proving it isn't just women's appearance on TV that people obsess about. Will it be kitten heels tomorrow?"
Classicist and BBC presenter Mary Beard wrote: "Blimey, I've been away for four days and while I have been away Jeremy Paxman has grown a beard!"
Broadcaster Danny Baker said: "I really do not think Jeremy Paxman should be granted a beard. It's corrupt. Disney had it right. Hey BBC - no news beards."
He added: "Do you think a single person in the news room had the balls to say 'Hey Jeremy. The beard. You look f***ing ridiculous'."
Newsnight economics editor Paul Mason wrote: "The rumour is they are screentesting for Tom Bombadil in the third Peter Jackson Hobbit movie".
ITV news presenter Alastair Stewart wrote of the University Challenge star's appearance: "Chilling to think how many readers/viewers just might not get the 'Paxman-beard-Newsnight' thing. Nor find it funny. Nor care. 'Nuff said."
Others compared Paxman's appearance to Father Christmas or Ben Fogle stranded on a desert island.
After Paxman accused the BBC of shunning on-screen beards, his former Newsnight colleague Martha Kearney broadcast an exchange which she had with Paxman which made him "sound a touch pogonophobic himself".
Kearney aired the conversation, which took place when she was a correspondent on Newsnight in 1997, on Radio 4 show World At One.
Paxman asked Kearney: "Why has he put Frank Dobson in charge of health, which he thinks allegedly is so important?"
When Kearney replied that it was because of Dobson's record in the shadow cabinet, Paxman replied: "But he's got a beard."
Kearney said that the exchange "completely left me for words".
Radio broadcaster Robin Lustig, a beard of the year winner, said that the BBC was pogonophobic.
"On TV, yes definitely, the evidence is there. There's no bearded current affairs presenter," he said.
"Michael Buerk once was told to shave off his beard if he wanted to carry on presenting.
"I did a little bit of television and I was told (by an external consultant) if I seriously wanted to do more I would have to get rid of my beard."
Facial hair recently became popular but Lustig said that Paxman might be behind the times, telling World At One: "I'm told that beards are no longer in fashion."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article