Island councils have joined forces to call for further powers to run their own affairs regardless of the outcome of next year's independence referendum.
Shetland, Orkney and Western Isles authorities want greater revenue-raising powers, improved energy connections with the mainland and a stronger recognition of their "status" in a Scottish constitutional settlement.
A key demand is for control of the sea bed, allowing revenue to be redirected from the Crown Estate to local needs.
New tax powers could give islanders more revenue from renewable energy and fisheries.
The three island council leaders set out their ambition in a joint campaign called Our Islands Our Future, hoping to build on the debate about Scotland's place in the United Kingdom.
Orkney Islands Council convener Steven Heddle said: "It is a measure of the importance of this to our three communities that we've joined forces today to ensure the voice of the islands is heard loud and clear during the pre-referendum debate.
"Islands by their very nature are special places with special requirements. The Western Isles, Shetland and Orkney each have a strong sense of identity. What we share is an abundance of natural resources and a pride in our cultural traditions.
"What we are calling for is a commitment that whatever the outcome, the needs and status of island areas are clearly recognised in the new era for Scotland that follows the referendum."
Angus Campbell, leader of Western Isles Council (Comhairle nan Eilean Siar), said it represents a once-in-a-generation opportunity for the islands.
"The constitutional debate offers the opportunity for the three island councils to secure increased powers for our communities to take decisions which will benefit the economies and the lives of those who live in the Islands," he said.
"We look forward to making that happen by working together as islands with the Scottish and UK governments."
Shetland Islands Council leader Gary Robinson said he wants to strengthen existing governance.
"There's no doubt that this is an historic opportunity for the islands, which will continue to punch above their weight in terms of their economic and cultural contribution to Scotland," he said.
Tavish Scott, the Liberal Democrat MSP for Shetland, backed the island councils' plan.
Scottish Lib Dem party activists have already agreed that Shetland and Orkney should loosen ties with Scotland and the UK and that the islands have a separate right to self-determination.
Mr Scott said: "London is pretty remote from our Islands. When the Scottish Government spend every working day removing power, financial and policy responsibility from local people a stand must be taken.
"I am very pleased that the island councils have now produced a blueprint of what they want from their governments. Devolution on power in 1999 to the Scottish Parliament in Edinburgh from London was meant to be about enhancing local government. Sadly the experience has been the opposite."
Scottish Conservative deputy leader Jackson Carlaw said the islands present an interesting argument but they cannot expect "better treatment" than any other area.
"Devolution has to work both ways, but the SNP's brand of it wants power from both sides," he said.
"Alex Salmond is intent on getting all the power he can from Westminster, and at the same time grabbing power from councils and other localised organisations. He has to realise you can't devolve on one side and centralise on the other.
"These councils have set out an interesting argument and while they can't expect to receive better treatment than any other area of Scotland, it is a welcome addition to the debate.
"We are all for councils being more accountable to those living in the area they serve. On many issues, there is no better decision-making body than the local authority."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article