The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has been fined £180,000 after thousands of confidential documents from an investigation into defence giant BAE Systems were sent to the wrong person.
The UK's privacy regulator, the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO), took action against the anti-fraud unit after evidence relating to 64 people was mistakenly sent to a witness in the case.
It is the first time the SFO has been fined by the watchdog, who said the public would be "quite rightly shocked" that information from such a high-profile case was not kept secure.
The documents related to the SFO's investigation into allegations that senior executives at BAE Systems had received payments, including two properties worth more than £6 million, as part of an arms deal with Saudi Arabia.
After the case was closed in February 2010, the SFO sent more than 2,000 bags of evidence to "Witness A" between November 2011 and February 2013.
It was later discovered that a "relatively inexperienced" temporary worker, who was not fully supervised, had mistakenly sent 407 of the bags belonging to 64 people to the witness, the ICO said.
They included bank statements showing payments made by BAE Systems to various individuals, hospital invoices, DVLA documents and passport details, the regulator added.
The SFO only began investigating the full circumstances of the breach after details of the errors were requested in response to a parliamentary question in June 2013.
The confidential material was later found in a storage facility which was also being used as a cannabis farm in east London, the then-shadow attorney general Emily Thornberry said at the time.
ICO Deputy Commissioner David Smith said: "People will be quite rightly shocked that the Serious Fraud Office failed to keep the information of so many individuals connected to such a high-profile case secure.
"Given how high-profile this case was, and how sensitive the evidence being returned to witnesses potentially was, it is astounding that the SFO got this wrong.
"This was an easily preventable breach that does not reflect well on the organisation."
The SFO had gathered more than 11,000 bags of evidence during its investigation into BAE from witnesses and suspects, Government departments, foreign governments and corporate banks, the ICO said.
The documents returned to Witness A included "confidential personal data" relating to 6,000 subjects, some of whom were in the public eye, and "sensitive personal data" relating to two subjects, according to the watchdog.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article