THE mother of a security guard unlawfully killed by a colleague who had not been properly vetted to work in Iraq has called for the firm which employed the men to apologise for their failings.
Danny Fitzsimons, from Rochdale, is serving a 20-year sentence in Iraq for murdering Paul McGuigan, 37, from Peebles, and Australian Darren Hoare, 37, within hours of arriving in Baghdad on August 9 2009.
All three were employed by G4S-owned ArmorGroup.
Fitzsimons, a former soldier in the Parachute Regiment, had been dismissed from the Army and was on the run for a string of offences when the security firm took him on without vetting him properly.
After an inquest into Mr McGuigan's death, Joanne Kearsley, area coroner for South Manchester, found "missed opportunities and failings" by the probation service to manage Fitzsimons' behaviour and a failure of G4S to ensure that he was adequately vetted before his deployment.
Mr McGuigan's mother, Corinne Boyd-Russell, 62, from Innerleithen, in the Borders, criticised the firm and said they had yet to apologise to her family.
"I have always said that Danny pulled the trigger but he's not the only one with my son's blood on his hands," she said.
"G4S is the third largest private sector employer in the world. It's time these rich and powerful organisations were properly accountable and that should start with an apology to all of us, to Paul's family.
"We've never had an apology after five and a half years."
A steroid user, described as violent and unpredictable, especially when drunk, Fitzsimons, 34, held extreme racist views. In pages of writings recovered by police from his home he had written: "I have lived a life of violence. Any chance I have to do someone I will take it."
While on bail he got the job with G4S, flew out to Baghdad, was issued with weapons, got drunk and shot dead his two colleagues at a base, less than 12 hours after arriving in the Green Zone of the Iraqi capital.
Each victim was shot three times with a Glock 9mm pistol - Mr McGuigan, a father of two, shot twice in the chest and once at point blank range in the mouth. Fitzsimons also shot and injured an Iraqi security guard before his arrest.
The inquest into Mr McGuigan's death, which first began last September at Stockport Coroner's Court, heard questions were raised over G4S's role in recruiting, vetting and deploying him to Iraq in 2009.
It was a "defining moment for the global security industry" at the time, the inquest heard, with security firms under pressure to recruit ex-forces personnel given the dangerous conditions in post-invasion Iraq.
Fitzsimons was deployed to Iraq without up-to-date references, with no criminal records bureau check and with a forged medical certificate.
During the inquest G4S staff accepted Fitzsimons should not have been sent to Iraq.
A fellow security guard saw his posts on Facebook talking of his forthcoming deployment, along with writings of a sexually violent nature, and sent emails from Afghanistan to G4S warning them not to employ him in such a volatile environment, but the emails were never received.
Delivering her 91-page narrative verdict, Joanne Kearsley, area coroner for South Manchester, rejected Fitzsimons' claims he suffered post-traumatic stress disorder after serving with the Paras in the Balkans War.
Ms Kearsley said G4S is an international company but at the time of employing Fitzsimons, and hundreds of others for work in the Middle East, the human resources team consisted of three people, with two people doing all vetting of recruits and the firm struggling to operate in an industry that was unregulated at the time.
Mr McGuigan, described as a "solid, professional and dependable man," had been living in Tameside at the time of his death and had previously worked as a bodyguard for ex-Beatle George Harrison.
He had one son, Reece McGuigan, 10, from a previous relationship and his fiancee Nicola Prestage, 37, was pregnant with his daughter, Elsie-mai, when he was shot by Fitzsimons.
Outside court Ms Prestage said: "He's nothing but a psychopath and in his own words was bloodthirsty to kill again."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article