A LOOPHOLE in the law that allowed the failure of attempted prosecutions over the Rosepark care home tragedy is expected to be plugged, it has emerged.
The Scottish Law Commission, which wants the law reformed, has published a report that says dissolved partnerships must be criminally liable.
It comes after an attempt to prosecute Rosepark's owners Thomas, Anne and Alan Balmer over alleged safety breaches after the death of 14 residents in a fire at the home in Uddingston, South Lanarkshire, collapsed four years ago.
It was ruled at the time the alleged offences could only be carried out by employers, and the three owners of the home named in the indictment were not employers in law.
Prosecutors launched a legal challenge but in July 2008 Lord Eassie ruled it would not be possible to prosecute the Balmers as the partnership known as Rosepark Care Home had been dissolved in 2005.
A new indictment was then directed against the Balmers as "surviving partners" of the now dissolved firm. But the third attempt failed in May 2009, with Lord Matthews calling the indictment "inept".
The commission is now recommending it "should remain competent to prosecute a partnership during a period of five years following its dissolution". Its report includes a draft bill which will go to UK Government for a final decision.
"The commission's report recommends a simple targeted solution to the problem thrown up by the Rosepark fire," the commission said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article