Areas of Scotland's forests are being offered on long-term leases to wind-farm developers as Alex Salmond surges ahead with his vision to make Scotland a world-leading green energy powerhouse.
An increased emphasis on turning over state-owned woodland to the renewables sector will see the number of power-generating wind turbines in forests increase. Between 700 and 1,000 turbines are expected to be erected on the National Forest Estate.
It is part of an ambitious target-driven policy championed by the First Minister to generate the equivalent of 100% of Scotland's electricity demand from renewables by 2020.
Nearly 60 square miles of forest are already being used for operational wind farms in Scotland. Under the plans, at the current rate, this figure could soar to some 240 square miles.
Plans to sell off England's public forest estate were abandoned by the Coalition after an expert panel said woodlands should remain in public ownership. It had been feared as many as 340 Scottish jobs could have been at risk had a UK-wide privatisation gone ahead.
Linda Holt, spokeswoman for Communities Against Turbines Scotland, condemned the expansion of the current policy, saying it would be challenged in the courts.
She said: "The Scottish Government may think it is entitled to turn publicly owned forests into wind farms but such a policy flies in the face of the Forestry Commission's own policies, local and national planning policies and the Scottish Government's commitment to increasing biodiversity.
"The Scottish Government is championing one industry, wind power, at the expense of another."
She added: "Forests are some of the worst places to build wind farms because they involve extensive tree-felling to create access and airspace for efficient turbine operation.
"There are major environmental 'disbenefits' and recognised major fire risks. I would expect there will be legal challenges."
The extent of the wind farm network was revealed when Finance Secretary John Swinney's budget on Thursday talked about an "advance" of "the next phase of renewables developments on the national forest estate".
Graeme Pearson, Labour MSP for South Scotland who chaired a Scottish National Wind Farm Conference last year, said: "There are many communities in south Scotland who have made representations to me about the environmental impact of wind farm development and the lack of consultation with communities to let them know how it affects them.
"One would hope the Government will be clear what this next stage means and that the communities are well aware of its impact."
The Forestry Commission Scotland (FCS) said the amount of electricity generated by the expansion would be enough to power one million homes a year.
An FCS spokesman said it had opted for leasing agreements with developers so the land would remain in public ownership.
It was estimated at the beginning of last year that the Forestry Commission would gather £30 million a year in rents but critics believe the figure represents only 10% of the profits energy giants will make.
The spokesman added: "The Scottish Government needs around 16GW of installed renewables capacity to meet its target of 100% of all consumption from renewable sources by 2020. Developments on the national forest estate could contribute nearly one-eighth of this.
"It's probable that some trees will be felled, but one of the key components of the Scottish Government's policy on the control of woodland removal was guidance on compensatory planting for any felling."
The Forestry Commission has already leased land to Scottish Power, which is owned by Spanish giant Iberdrola, German-based E.ON and Norway's Fred Olsen Renewables.
Data shows that since 2007 about 26,000 acres of publicly owned woodlands have been sold off, generating a profit of more than £28m.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article