Royal Bank of Scotland boss Stephen Hester has announced plans to step down from the lender after five years at the helm.
Mr Hester will leave later this year and will receive 12 months' pay and benefits worth £1.6 million and the potential for a £4 million shares windfall from a long-term incentive scheme. But he will receive no bonus for 2013.
He said: "We are now in a position where the Government can begin to prepare for privatising RBS.
"While leading that process would be the end of an incredible chapter for me, ideally for the company it should be led by someone at the beginning of their journey."
Chancellor George Osborne said Mr Hester should be commended for "having brought RBS back from the brink" following its taxpayer bail out at the height of the financial crisis.
He said: "When Stephen Hester took on the job at RBS in 2008 it was a bust bank with a broken culture and posed a huge risk to financial stability.
"RBS today is safer, stronger and better able to support its customers. I want to commend Stephen Hester for everything he has done to make this turnaround possible."
He added Mr Hester had "made an important contribution to Britain's recovery from the financial crisis".
RBS has launched a search for his successor immediately.
Mr Hester will continue in his role until December, unless a successor is in post before then.
The decision comes amid mounting speculation over government plans for RBS, which is 81% owned by the State.
A high-powered commission of MPs and Lords are reportedly set to recommend that the bank is split into a good bank and a bad bank.
A draft copy of a report from the Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards is believed to suggest breaking up the taxpayer-backed lender.
But RBS itself has claimed it is well on the road to recovery, despite reporting losses of £5.2 billion for 2012, driven by a £390 million settlement for rate-fixing, £1.1 billion provision for mis-selling and IT glitches.
Mr Hester said: "It has been nearly five years since I joined RBS after the bank was rescued by the Government.
"In that time we have reduced the bank's balance sheet by nearly a trillion pounds, repaid hundreds of millions of taxpayer support, and removed the imminent threat that this bank's size and complexity posed to the UK economy."
Philip Hampton, chairman of RBS, praised Mr Hester's leadership of the bank and said he would be leaving it in a "vastly improved position that many would have thought impossible five years ago".
He added: "In the midst of a major crisis, he accepted the challenge of stabilising the bank, turning it around, and putting us in a position where we can begin to plan for returning the organisation to the private sector. His achievements have been considerable.
"We will continue Stephen's work to remove the barriers to privatisation over the next year and continue to do everything possible to support the British economy. "
Mr Osborne confirmed he would "shortly" set out plans for RBS following the imminent publication of the Parliamentary Commission on Banking's report and said he would use his Mansion House speech next week to outline further reforms.
"Having brought RBS back from the brink, now is the time to move on from the rescue phase to focus on RBS being a UK bank that provides greater support to the British economy, helping businesses and job creation here, and which can return to the private sector in a way that ensures value for the taxpayer," he said.
Business Secretary Vince Cable said: "He (Hester) performed a necessary role at a difficult time. Going forward, RBS needs more of a focus on SME lending and supporting the economy."
Unite national officer Dominic Hook said the news will come as a "shock for staff" and called for transparency for existing staff.
He added: "Unite will be demanding an urgent meeting with RBS management because staff must not be left in the dark over the future direction of the bank.
"With over 30,000 job losses over the last five years and major stress for RBS staff there is likely to be a lot of anger over Stephen Hestor's tax-payer funded multi-million pound exit package.
"After years of uncertainty it's time the bank and the government ensured that people and communities come first, not private profit. The government has the opportunity to shape RBS into a bank that serves the people. It can not afford to miss this opportunity. "
Mr Hester told reporters that it had been the board's choice for him to make way for someone new to lead the bank through privatisation and that he had been prepared to carry on.
"It is a board decision, not mine, but I am completely comfortable with the rationale behind it," he said.
He said he was "co-operating amicably and will stick around as long as they need me" before going on holiday.
But he also admitted having "some human regrets" about not completing the bank's transition back to private markets.
"I have been pretty clear that I suppose I feel torn about this - I feel a sense of loyalty to the company and I want to do what is right for the company.
"If that was to lead the company through privatisation, I wanted to do that."
Sir Philip Hampton said that the board had been thinking about succession for a while.
The process accelerated in recent weeks as it became apparent Government had a desire for RBS to be privatised towards the end of 2014, he said.
"We had a board meeting which took place this afternoon and pretty much as soon as the board meeting finished we made the announcement," Sir Philip said.
He said that a window had opened up during a "period of calm" to allow somebody new to get their feet under the table before facing the challenge of privatisation.
He also praised Mr Hester for putting RBS back on a "sound financial footing", adding: "I think Stephen has done an outstanding job in rebuilding RBS amid the chaos the company faced in 2008 and 2009.
"It is a great tribute to him that we can now contemplate going towards privatisation, but I think it is fair to say that it has been a particularly grueling experience for Stephen."
Sir Philip said the company would be starting to search for a replacement from today and added that he was confident such a challenging role would attract strong candidates.
He also confirmed that Mr Hester's contract would be honoured to the letter and as a "good leaver" he would keep his entitlements.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article