Scotland's Chief Constable Sir Stephen House has declared a rise in abusive behaviour on social media is replacing traditional forms of vandalism.
Sir Stephen pointed his finger at the popular micro-blogging site Twitter, which he says is allowing users to vent their anger online rather than in the traditional form of vandalism that involved spray-painting angry comments on walls and bus shelters.
Twitter claims to have 15 million users in the UK, and 500 million globally. Launched in the US in 2006, it allows people to send and receive text-messaged sized statements - or "tweets" - of no more than 140 characters.
Questioned at a meeting of the force's oversight body, the Scottish Police Authority, on why traditional antisocial behaviour crimes were on the wane, Sir Stephen said: "Social media in some instances has replaced graffiti as a way of making your views heard. We have had to deal with offensive comments made on Twitter. My view is that 10 to 15 years ago, that would have been sprayed on the side of a building."
Vandalism, fire-raising, malicious damage and related crimes have been falling dramatically in recent years. There were 13,453 of such Group 4 offences, most of which are against property, in April-June 2014, the first quarter of this financial year.
That was down nearly eight per cent on the same period a year before. But the figure has more than halved since 2009-10, when it stood at 28,146.
Challenged on why this was, Sir Stephen did not just blame the transition of abuse from graffiti to Twitter. The downward trend in the figures, he said, probably deserved to be studied for a university thesis.
The chief constable took some of the credit for his own force - and its predecessors - for focusing on "local policing and high-visibility patrols".
He said: "We have seen a significant drop in anti-social behaviour and we see fewer complaints of drinking in public complaints. Some of these things tend to go with vandalism, graffiti and damage to property." Downplaying suggestions that public apathy had led to fewer calls to the police about vandalism, Sir Stephen stressed societal changes. He praised architects and designers for helping to make it harder to commit vandalism - and harder to break things.
"I think we should also give credit to intelligent design as well," he said. "Things are harder to vandalise than they used to be. It is most cost-effective to build something that is difficult to vandalise, say a bus shelter, than it is replace it.
"We have a lot of success against gangs. Some of it has been that the Xbox and PlayStation generation is less of a gang generation. They are not out in the street so much. You can correlate that with things like the general view that youth fitness is not where it was. Why? Because they are not out playing football to all hours of the day and night. They are inside on the Xbox, But if they are not outside, they are not doing the damage.
"But that takes us back to social media, people staying indoors may be committing some sorts of crimes like cybervandalism, but it is not visible to the rest of the community."
Police can and do investigate Twitter crimes - although a recent investigation of racist abuse against an Irish-born Glasgow SNP councillor, Feargal Dalton, fell through after officers failed to obtain information from the social media giant.
Sir Stephen stressed that abuse was abuse wherever it occurred. "When challenged, some people say 'I didn't say that, I put it on Twitter'. Well, it is the same as saying it."
Police Scotland itself has invested heavily in its own social media presence. It reported to yesterday's meeting in Clydebank that it now has 571,610 followers on Twitter. That represents a rise of four per cent over the summer.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article