The Great British Bake Off judge Paul Hollywood has denied giving preferential treatment to 21-year-old contestant Ruby Tandoh because of her looks.
The TV judge spoke out after fans of the hit BBC2 show pointed to an on-screen flirtation between the pair.
Hollywood, 47, who judges Bake Off with Mary Berry, dismissed as "rubbish" the suggestion that former model Tandoh's appearance had improved her chances on the show.
"Personally I think (fellow contestant) Kimberley's far prettier. With all the love in the world, Ruby's not my type," he told the Radio Times.
"But she's a great baker, one of the most talented bakers who has walked in that tent."
The judge, who left Alexandra, 49, his wife of 15 years, amid an attempt to launch his career in the US and reports of a relationship with his US co-star Marcela Valladolid, 35, added: "My job is to judge what goes on the plate. Always has been, always will be.
"I don't judge the person - Mary will back me up on this - because it's not one judge doing this. It's two. And we both say the same thing."
Hollywood said that it was coincidence that the fourth series of the hit show will have no men in the final.
"We had an all-male final last year, and an all-women final the year before," he said.
"There's no difference between male and female bakers. All I'm thinking of are the bakes. It's by the by what sex the bakers are."
Meanwhile, Tandoh, who is studying for a philosophy degree, said that she was not bothered by accusations of favouritism.
"It's easy to brush it off because I know how it was in the tent - and there was no favouritism. It was all very fair so that doesn't get to me very much," she said.
Publishers are said to be preparing to approach the Essex-born student to write a cookery book, which could lead to her own TV show.
Asked whether she thought Hollywood was a sex symbol, Tandoh told student magazine The Tab: "Not for me! Not my thing but, you know, for other people maybe that's what they go for."
Meanwhile, fellow contestant Frances Quinn, 31, said that the bakers were taking Rescue Remedy, a natural flower solution, to get them through the show.
"I feel bad because I'm the one that started the trend for it. I became Ruby's feeder! You're only meant to have a few drops. We'd jokingly go, 'A few drops, or a few shots?'," she told the Radio Times.
Meanwhile, it has been revealed that the hit show is to be moved to BBC1 next year as a result of its rising ratings.
The contest, which reaches its climax with the final of the fourth series next week, has had BBC2's highest viewing figures so far this year with an average audience of seven million.
BBC1 controller Charlotte Moore announced the move of channels today and it will begin for the fifth batch of shows.
She said: "It's been fantastic to watch it flourish on BBC2 and I can assure viewers I will continue to cherish it on BBC1."
The audience has grown from an average of 2.8 million for the first series in 2010, peaking with 7.8 million a fortnight ago - more than even last year's final, which drew a total of 7.2 million
The show - featuring experts Mary Berry and Paul Hollywood - has been credited with giving the nation a new-found interest in baking, and the format of the show has been sold to more than a dozen countries.
Moore, who originally commissioned the show when she was in another role in 2009, said she thought the time was right to bring the show to "an even broader audience".
"I've watched the series grow over the last few years and earn a special place in the nation's hearts. It's inspiring and warm storytelling at its best which celebrates the huge talent of enthusiastic and passionate bakers from all over the country," she said.
Executive producer of the show Anna Beattie, who is chief executive of Love Productions which makes it, said: "We're extremely proud that the show has captivated so many families and inspired so many people across the country and we aim to do everything we can to ensure its continuing authenticity and integrity."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article