PARENTS have called for an end to compulsory religious observance in Scottish schools, sparking a backlash from church representatives.
The Scottish Parent Teacher Council (SPTC) said school communities that no longer wanted a religious element to meetings such as assemblies should be allowed to replace them with secular alternatives.
The controversial call from the group which represents PTAs and parent councils across the country comes in the wake of a petition to the Scottish Parliament by the Scottish Secular Society.
The society is calling for a change to the Education (Scotland) Act 1980 to make religious observance an opt-in activity, rather than an opt-out one, as is currently the case.
Scottish novelist Christopher Brookmyre, chief executive of the British Humanist Association Andrew Copson and the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science have backed the petition.
According to 2011 Census statistics, Scotland is moving away from Christianity. Figures showed 54% of residents saw themselves as Christian - down 11% since 2001.
In its response to the Holyrood petition, Eileen Prior, executive director of the SPTC, said: "Overall, the concept of religious observance has been watered down in an attempt to fit it to Scotland as it is today, a multi-faith and no-faith society that has moved a long way since 1980.
"Generally, we feel the time has come to remove the compulsory requirement on schools for religious observance and replace it by a more secular duty for the development of the whole person, as recognised in the curriculum.
"Ultimately, we think the nature, organisation, venue and frequency of school-based religious gatherings should be determined locally, with the agreement of the school community."
Ms Prior said in some areas that might mean the continuation of religious observance while in others the focus might be on secular spiritual development.
The suggestions were dismissed by both the Church of Scotland and the Catholic Church.
A Church of Scotland spokesman said: "We think religious observance, or time for reflection, in schools is an essential activity for young people to learn about and better understand our world.
"We fully support an approach which takes into account the diversity of a school community with regard to pupils and staff from a wide range of traditions, including those with no religion.
"The Church believes that time for reflection or religious observance, as defined by the Scottish Government's 2005 guidelines and 2011 advice letter, provides a fundamental part of the cross-curricular, whole school curriculum in the same way that personal and social development is regarded."
Michael McGrath, director of the Scottish Catholic Education Service, hit out at the SPTC.
He said: "The suggestion would not be acceptable to us even though it would be unlikely to have an impact on our schools. Religious observance across the school system offers an opportunity for the spiritual development of the school community and a reflection of its hopes and aspirations. Religious observance does that really well because it is rooted in the wisdom of a tradition that dates back thousands of years.
"We would not want to see that replaced with a vague, meaningless alternative notion of who we are and where we are going."
The primary headteachers' body the Association of Headteachers and Deputes in Scotland argued a change to opt in would create a "considerable additional administrative burden on schools" without making any change to the flexibility open to children and families.
Last year, The Humanist Society Scotland said pupils in both Catholic and non-denominational schools were being "indoctrinated" with Christian beliefs against Government guidelines.
The society said the legal right of parents to withdraw their children from religious education and religious observance was being widely ignored in state schools.
Since 2005, Scottish schools have been required to make parents aware they can remove their children from religious education and observance.
However, churches believe religious observance in all schools is so inclusive that there would be very few occasions when a parent felt they should exercise the right to opt out.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article