A NEW UK Border Agency advertising campaign that tells asylum-seekers how easy it is to go home has been met with widespread criticism.
The controversial campaign, which has been descirbed as offensive and insensitive, asks immigrants how hard their lives are in Scotland and says: "Let us help you go home."
It is being tested in Glasgow, where the main public inquiries office of UKBA in Scotland has been plastered with images of aeroplanes, while the centre's seats are branded with the slogan: "Ask about going home."
One poster, apparently showing a person sleeping rough on the streets, states: "Is life here hard? Going home is simple."
Another shows a photo of an aircraft and says: "The plane can take you home. We can book the tickets."
The campaign is running at the UKBA office in Brand Street, Glasgow, and the reporting centre in Hounslow, west London. It started on July 29 and will run until October 4.
It was defended by the Home Office as part of a policy to provide sensitive advice and assistance to help failed asylum-seekers return home with dignity, but critics say the office is also used by asylum-seekers still in the system.
However, Tom Harris, MP for Glasgow South, described the pilot as "political posturing" and criticised the way it asked asylum-seekers about their desire to go home.
He said: "This is crazy. If someone has applied for asylum and is pursuing that then the question has already been answered.
"This is all about pitching to particular people in Britain, not asylum-seekers. Their actual target is the voters in the next European elections. It is a cynical ploy which will only result in asylum-seekers feeling very vulnerable. It is utterly pointless and incredibly insensitive.
"Private letters to asylum-seekers whose claims have failed already explain that there is help available if they do wish to leave the UK."
The campaign follows the controversial "Go home or face arrest" vans debacle earlier this summer which resulted in the Home Office being persuaded to drop its campaign following cross-party criticism. The Advertising Standards Authority is investigating those posters.
Responding to the Glasgow campaign, David MacLachlan, minister of Langside Parish Church, said: "I am horrified by this. It is so, so offensive. After the controversy of the 'go home' vans in London they are purposefully doing this in a room where general members of the public cannot go.
"There may be bogus asylum-seekers in the system but they are unlikely to be reporting to a centre. Most are genuine and come from incredibly frightening situations. These are the most vulnerable people in our society and it is appalling to treat them like this."
James Dornan, SNP MSP for Glasgow Cathcart, said: "I condemn this and urge them to reconsider this so-called pilot and take their extreme tactics out of Scotland."
John Wilkes, chief executive of the Scottish Refugee Council, said: "We are very concerned about the appropriateness of new signage in the Home Office reporting centre in Glasgow.
"Voluntary return is just not an option for many refugees who are from war-torn countries such as Syria, Iran and Eritrea as they would face certain persecution and a real threat to their lives. One young asylum-seeker burst into tears when he saw the message about going home and seeing family and friends again. He has no idea if his family are alive or dead.
"Using blunt communications to suggest that going home is easy is insensitive and inappropriate and can send the wrong messages to people about whether their claims will be treated objectively and fairly."
UKBA said the people attending the office had had claims turned down or had breached their conditions - a point strongly disputed by the Refugee Council which says this office is frequented by asylum-seekers at different stages in the process.
A Home Office spokesman said: "Those with no right to remain in the UK should leave voluntarily. These posters are designed to ensure people know we can provide sensitive advice and assistance to help them return home with dignity.
"We also continue to work closely with community groups who welcome the opportunity for someone who is not here legally to leave the country of their own accord."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article