Britain's newest nuclear-powered submarine was forced to abandon sea trials and return to port in the Clyde after a system defect was discovered last week.
HMS Ambush – which was handed over to the Royal Navy just last month – was towed back to the Faslane naval base near Helensburgh after coming to an unexpected halt in the middle of Gare Loch on Wednesday.
The £1.6 billion sub, right, was seen to be in difficulties by anti-nuclear campaigners from the Faslane Peace Camp. Crew members were seen standing on top of the vessel, which was venting steam and surrounded by three tugs.
The Ministry of Defence (MoD) has confirmed that the submarine experienced a problem, but declined to give specific details.
Something went wrong that "affected a variety of systems", an MoD spokesman said.
He said: "Following HMS Ambush's maintenance period, undertaken at HM's Naval Base Clyde, an issue with a non-nuclear system was identified. A decision was taken to return it to the base to allow remedial action to take place."
The independent nuclear expert, John Large, said: "The MoD should immediately publish a frank and independent risk assessment.
"We need to know the risks of returning this crippled submarine and its potential radiological impact on nearby Helensburgh and communities further afield. The public deserves to be fully informed if there is any radiological risk and harm deriving from this incident."
Large, who has advised governments on nuclear sub safety, suggested Ambush's propulsion system could have been disabled.
He said: "This would be a completely intolerable event if Ambush was on patrol, during which she is expected to operate at a war footing without need for nearby assistance."
The SNP leader in Westminster, Angus Robertson MP, said he would be demanding details of what happened from the MoD.
"Any incident involving a nuclear submarine is worrying and this is not the first time something alarming like this has occurred in Scottish waters," he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article