FORMER Royal Bank of Scotland boss Fred Goodwin tried to pull out of the catastrophic deal to buy ABN Amro at the last minute, a new book has claimed.
The £58 billion takeover of the Dutch bank is widely regarded to have destabilised RBS and led to its eventual bailout by the taxpayer during the height of the financial crisis.
But a new book by financial journalist Ian Fraser says that Goodwin twice tried to persuade the partner firm in the takeover, Spanish bank Santander, to back out.
The author claims that the Scot, nicknamed The Shred for his abrasive manner and cost-cutting, wanted to pull the plug on the deal after ABN Amro sold its US business, which was considered its most lucrative venture.
However, he was overruled by Santander's Emilio Botin.
Fraser's book - titled Shredded - claims that Botin threatened legal action if Goodwin and RBS walked away. The author also alleges that Alfred Saenz, chief executive of Santander, later boasted that his firm came out best from the deal, saying: "We are the only ones to come out smiling. We have got the better of our consortium partners."
Fred Goodwin became the public face of the bank's collapse and the subject of much of the public's ire over bankers' behaviour.
He stepped down when his part in the bank's downfall became public knowledge and was later stripped of his knighthood.
RBS declined to comment on the claims contained in the book.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article