A SECOND book containing what is purportedly a lost Sherlock Holmes story has been discovered.
The 1,300 word tale, which bears the signature Arthur Conan Doyle, has been unearthed after the same book was found elsewhere in the Selkirk.
It is the first story about the sleuth to be unearthed in 80 years.
The anonymous short tale, the Book o' the Brig, was sold as part of a fundraising effort to help save a town bridge.
The original copy was found by historian Walter Elliot, 80. It had been original sold in the early part of the last century.
Now a second copy has been discovered, which belonged to late local man Alex Cuthill.
The Book o' the Brig's final page reveals the Edinburgh-born Sherlock author visited Selkirk on the day in question, Saturday 12 December, 1903, to open a bazaar in aid of the new bridge, or Iron Brig, which had been washed away be a flood.
Now this second copy, signed 'Arthur Conan Doyle' on the cover, also places the crime author at the scene.
Conan Doyle knew the area well, having failed to become a Unionist MP in the Hawick Burghs constituency in 1906.
The replacement Iron Brig is itself due to be swept away by Selkirk's £31.4million Flood Protection Scheme, and a new wooden bridge built at the same crossing.
Mr Cuthill's daughter Jean, who still lives in the Borders, told us: "My father said the signature was faint, so he was going to go over it in pencil. My husband said: 'No you will not!'"
However, neither Mrs Cuthill or her father knew whether Sir Arthur penned the story. Many Sherlock fans and experts around the world have expressed their doubts, arguing it is more likely to be a pastiche, penned in honour of his visit.
Mr Elliot had donated his Book o' the Brig to the community museum, she was delighted to tell him. However, Mrs Cuthill added: "I've got one too - but mine's signed!"
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article