IT perhaps comes as no surprise to some observers who have viewed a famous image purportedly of Nessie.
Yesterday, a man who took a photograph last year that attracted worldwide interest because it was purportedly of the Loch Ness monster admitted it was a fake.
George Edwards, 61, who boasted of having photographed the world-famous monster, has said the picture which emerged last summer had been "just a bit of fun".
The cruise boat operator on Loch Ness had produced what some observers described as the most convincing Nessie frauds for almost 80 years.
It was compared favourably to the "Surgeon's Photograph" taken by Dr Robert Kenneth Wilson, which was also published widely after it was taken in 1934 supposedly showed the monster's head and neck, but was later proved to be a hoax.
At the time, a Nessie expert said: "It is the best photograph I think I have ever seen."
Mr Edwards showed no remorse for his fraud and said: "So as far as I'm concerned it's perfectly valid.
"It's just a bit of fun. I am quite happy to join the rogues' gallery along with the surgeon who produced the best known picture image of the monster in the world.
"How do you think Loch Ness would have fared over the years without that picture? I have no guilty feelings at all about what I have done."
Mr Edwards has been embroiled in a bitter row with others in the loch's tourist community, who he accuses of taking a "scientific" rather than "fun" approach to Nessie.
He criticised Drumnadrochit Chamber of Commerce for treating the monster as "a myth" and damaging the tourist industry.
He wrote them an open letter in which he said: "Most of the people I talk to on my boat know that it's just a bit of fun.
"What brings more people to Loch Ness - my little stories about Nessie, or the so-called experts going on about big waves and big fish? They should stop taking themselves so seriously.
"At the end of the day there's no such thing as an expert on Loch Ness, just people with an opinion."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article