A deal between atheists and theists over allowing prayers in schools is to be debated by MSPs.
The Church of Scotland and the Humanist Society of Scotland have called for legislation to be introduced to change the name of "Religious Observance" to "Time for Reflection".
They say it would make the events more inclusive after concerns over gatherings where one belief system is said to have been promoted over another, the two said.
The title is the same as the Scottish Parliament's moment of thoughtful tribute set aside for MSPs to quietly consider issues of personal or spiritual importance. The Kirk and humanists' plan will be defended jointly by the usually opposing bodies on Tuesday at the Holyrood petitions committee debate.
Rev Sally Foster Fulton, convenor of the Church of Scotland's Church and Society Council, said the Kirk "welcomes this exciting opportunity to collaborate with our humanist colleagues in supporting genuinely inclusive 'Time for Reflection' in schools that supports the community and spiritual development of all pupils".
She added: "Scotland is a wonderfully diverse nation. Regular, inclusive Time for Reflection will enhance young people's ability to celebrate difference."
Douglas Mclellan, Chief Executive of the Humanist Society Scotland said: "We urge the Public Petitions Committee to make strong recommendation for the change of Religious Observance to 'Time for Reflection'. This removes the exclusivity of Religious Observance and brings about fairness and equality for all.
"If this change is made, it will bring current practices in-line with the modern demographic in Scotland."
Simon Barrow, co-director to Christian think tank Ekklesia said: "It is vital for a healthy society that people of different religious and non-religious outlooks can learn to share public space fairly, collaborate on common values, uphold the rights and dignity of all, and negotiate disagreements with informed respect."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article