THE sister of a millionaire newspaper boss has begun a Court of Session action disputing a will drawn up just days before her death from cancer.
Elizabeth Smyth claims Deirdre Romanes did not know what she was doing when she gave instructions about what was to happen to her £4.6 million estate. She has accused her late sister's ex-husband, Monaco-based Iain Romanes, of persuading her to change the will.
A will drawn up some two years earlier favoured younger sister Ms Smyth, of County Meath, Ireland, and she has already won a court decision blocking the sale of prestige property in Edinburgh's New Town until the issue is resolved.
Mrs Smyth wants judge Lord Glennie to set aside the later will as Mrs Romanes, of Edinburgh "lacked capacity". The court papers claim Mrs Romanes was weak and facile and easily imposed upon, allowing Mr Romanes and three other individuals, named as her executors, to get their way.
If the second will stands, the bulk of Mrs Romanes' estate will be ploughed, through a trust fund, into the Dunfermline Press.
Mr Romanes, who left his wife for another woman, continued to be a director of the company after the marriage broke up in 2001 and holds a block of shares.
Sixty-year-old Mrs Romanes died in May 2010 after a long battle with cancer which she had kept secret, even from family and close friends, until the end.
For two years before her death the newspaper had been in trouble and managing director Mrs Romanes was said to be determined it should keep going.
The second will, which instructed a payment of £3m into Mrs Romanes' Liferent Trust, was seen as a way of doing this.
The hearing is expected to last two weeks.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article