Monkeys are savvier than human consumers when it comes to getting value for money, research has shown.
Psychological studies have demonstrated how easy it is to fool people into thinking that price reflects quality.
In tests, human volunteers consistently prefer the taste of wine poured out of an expensively labelled bottle to exactly the same wine with a cheap label.
But scientists found they could not make a monkey out of brown capuchins in quite the same way.
The researchers set up an elaborate "market" in which the monkeys were trained to exchange tokens for rewards in form of chunks of flavoured ice, jelly, or juice.
They also learned that some rewards were cheap and others expensive in terms of how many one token could buy. A single token purchased three of the cheap goods, but only one of the pricier rewards.
The studies showed that while the monkeys understood differences in price, they stubbornly refused to fall for the idea that higher-priced rewards tasted better.
US lead researcher Laurie Santos, from Yale University, said: "We know that capuchin monkeys share a number of our own economic biases.
"Our previous work has shown that monkeys are loss-averse, irrational when it comes to dealing with risk, and even prone to rationalising their own decisions, just like humans. But this is one of the first domains we've tested in which monkeys show more rational behaviour than humans do.
"For humans, higher price tags often signal that other people like a particular good. Our richer social experiences with markets might be the very thing that leads us - and not monkeys - astray in this case."
The findings are reported in the online journal Frontiers in Psychology.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article