SCOTS linguistic experts are to analyse over 2.3 billion words compiled from speeches made by lawmakers over a 200 year period to measure how Parliamentary language has changed.
Researchers at Glasgow University are aiming to understand when and why certain topics are raised in parliament and how their use evolved over time.
They will examine Parliamentary speeches made between 1803 and 2003 and use them to chart the popularity of topics such as war, honesty, honour, homosexuality and terrorism.
The experts will also try to study how the language of individual MPs changed during their tenure in office.
The 15 month project will use Hansard, the official Westminster records, which contain reports of all Parliamentary speeches, votes, ministerial statements and parliamentary questions given in the House of Lords and the House of Commons.
Researchers will firstly develop a computer programme which is capable of sorting through and aggregating the huge amounts of lexical data.
In the second part of the project, the team will use the software to hone in on key phrases and concepts that recur over time. By measuring the frequency and context of the appearances, they will build what researchers describe as the most detailed analysis yet of the concerns of Parliament over the past two centuries.
Lead investigator, Dr Marc Alexander said: "Looking at Hansard will hopefully reveal patterns in our society. We will use it to analyse how Parliament anticipates or reacts to major global events and social issues. We can even use it to look at how the language of individuals, such as Thatcher or Churchill, changed over the course of their political careers."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article