MORE than 100 leading artists have called for a radical shake-up of Scotland's art funding body in an unprecedented letter.
Writers and artists including Ian Rankin, Alasdair Gray, and Turner Prize winners Richard Wright and Martin Boyce attack Creative Scotland's "ill-conceived decision-making; unclear language, lack of empathy and regard for Scottish culture".
In the letter, leading arts figures say that trust between artists and the funder, which spends Government and lottery money, is "low and receding daily".
And they make seven key demands of the body which has been come under heavy criticism, particularly in recent months, over changes to the way artists and arts companies are funded.
The artists stop short of calling for resignations or an official vote of no confidence, but they say Creative Scotland is damaged at the heart and that artists' faith is at an unprecedented low.
The letter marks the onset of a full-scale campaign from artists to reform the funding body. Other signatories include playwright and artist John Byrne, writers Don Paterson, James Kelman, AL Kennedy and Andrew O'Hagan, the nation's Makar Liz Lochhead, playwrights David Greig, Zinnie Harris and David Harrower, and composers James MacMillan and Sir Peter Maxwell Davies.
The national and international standing and reputation of its many signatories will cause deep unease at the Scottish Government, whose Culture Secretary, Fiona Hyslop, has called for the body to improve and clarify its relationships with artists in recent months.
It will also put more pressure on Andrew Dixon, chief executive of the body, who recently gave evidence at Holyrood defending Creative Scotland.
Also in the letter, the group call for Creative Scotland to "genuinely acknowledge the scale of the problem"; to "affirm the value of stable two to three year funding for small arts organisations"; and to end the use of "business speak" jargon.
They call on the body to revisit its policies with a concentration on social and cultural as well as commercial values; to redesign funding processes; ensure funding decisions are taken by people with artform expertise; and to establish an effective system of dealing with complaints as swiftly as possible.
Anger has been growing for months in the cultural community against the body led by Mr Dixon, former chief executive of the NewcastleGateshead Initiative, Venu Dhupa, its director of creative development, and its chairman Sir Sandy Crombie, former chief executive of Standard Life.
Creative Scotland was formed two years ago of a merger of Scottish Screen and the Scottish Arts Council and this year controversy over its policies, notably the removal of fixed term flexible funding for more than 40 arts organisations, has been growing, as well as frustration with its attitude towards critics.
In Parliament, Mr Dixon said he would prefer artists to talk to Creative Scotland rather than through the press or online.
On this, the letter says: "Individual voices have also been raised from many quarters both privately and in public.
"These concerns have gone unanswered or been met with defensiveness, outright denial, or been ascribed to problems with 'communication'."
The organisers of the letter said many artists approached to sign it declined for fear of endangering their future funding.
In a statement, those who sent the letter to Creative Scotland said: "Our hope in putting together this letter is to begin a process of formalising, witnessing and testifying to the genuine anger that many artists feel; the belief that Creative Scotland is damaged at the heart, and that while this is so, artist faith is at an unprecedented low – quite an irony in this designated Year of Creative Scotland."
Ms Hyslop said: "My support for Creative Scotland and its leadership was expressed in my recent letter to Sir Sandy Crombie, which also urged the organisation to be open and responsive to the sector's concerns. My view has not changed."
A spokesman for Creative Scotland said: "We absolutely acknowledge we have issues in terms of restoring trust and collaborative working practices with the arts and culture sector, where this has faltered, and we are working hard to do this.
"We are working closely with representative bodies from the cultural sector such as the Federation of Scottish Theatre, the Literature Forum, the Scottish Contemporary Arts Network, Craft Scotland and others and have been making real progress in recent weeks.
"We are totally committed to working collaboratively with the arts and culture sector, we are listening very closely to what that sector is telling us and we are taking positive action as a result across a number of operational and strategic areas."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article