IT HAS been one of the most enduring mysteries of Scottish history, but archaeologists say they have uncovered the precise location of the Battle of Bannockburn.
While it remains a pivotal feature of Scotland's folklore, the exact site of the battle has been disputed for centuries.
Teams of researchers have often visited the area to determine where it actually took place, but any real evidence has been hard to come by.
However, a two-year investigation led by the BBC has unearthed new evidence which points to an area near the Bannock Burn known as the Carse of Balquhiderock as the battle site.
Historians believe the English army, led by King Edward II, camped on the Carse after the first day of the battle on June 23, 1314.
They argue that the Scots launched a daring raid at daybreak on June 24 - a tactical move by Robert the Bruce which ensured victory.
The researchers found a handful of medieval objects - a cross pendant, a heel spur and a stirrup - which are thought to have been discarded by retreating English calvary as they fled from their camp on the Carse.
The items were found on the southern bank of the Bannock Burn, at a spot where it is believed the English army had crossed the night before.
The historians argue the retreating calvary would have returned to this same site during the frenzy of their retreat.
Dr Tony Pollard, director of the Centre of Battlefield Archaeology at Glasgow University, was one of the lead researchers of the project.
In his view, the objects provide "tangible evidence" that the battle took place on the Carse.
He said: "Over the years and through working on this project, I have come to firmly believe that the battle on the second crucial day was on the Carse.
"Robert the Bruce would only have fought the battle if he had the tactical upper hand.
"And the way to get that was by going down onto the Carse -meeting his enemy rather than wait for them to come up the high ground where his army was initially located."
He added: "With these finds, Bannockburn becomes the earliest field battle site in Britain to have yielded relevant battle objects from a scientific investigation.
"They are consistent with the mayhem in the wake of the battle, dropped as the English forces fled the battle site on the Carse, crossing over the Bannock Burn at a point where they had previously crossed and knew they could potentially get over.
"As these guys were flying across the burn there is no doubt that this stuff is going to be falling off. It would have been absolute panic."
The Bannockburn project was led by the BBC in tandem with the University of Glasgow, the National Trust for Scotland, Guard Archaeology, and Historic Scotland.
The two-year project involved the use of metal detectors, computer mapping, historical research, re-enactments, geophysics and extensive archaeology. More than 3000 metal objects were found in the area, although only a handful were deemed to be relevant to the battle.
Many other objects that were uncovered are still being subjected to ongoing analysis.
The story of the entire project will be shown as a two-part documentary, The Quest for Bannockburn, which begins tonight on BBC Scotland.
It will be presented by the historian and archaeologist Neil Oliver, who also took part in the project. He said: "Never before has the Battle of Bannockburn been so thoroughly investigated.
"The place where Edward had decided to camp was at first glance strategically sound.
"There was water for the horses and the Bannockburn, and another stream, the Pelstream, surrounded him, providing protection from surprise attacks from behind.
"But ironically, the supposed safe ground where the English chose to camp, turned out to be their nemesis."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article