A DECISION to make £73 million worth of cuts at a local authority – with up to 1400 jobs at risk – has been delayed until after Christmas amid claims the options are too "horrific" to bare.
Leaders at North Lanarkshire Council have deferred the crunch decision, saying the three-year savings plan cannot be rushed.
Potential cuts being weighed up include reductions in the free school bus service, school cleaners and bin collections.
It is understood that infighting among the ruling Labour group has contributed to the delay as the full reality of the necessary cuts to spending emerged.
Workers, service users and residents had been told a decision would be taken this month.
But council leader Jim McCabe confirmed yesterday the full extent of the cuts will be confirmed after the festive break.
Mr McCabe said: "The options we choose will have huge implications for everyone in North Lanarkshire and they require careful consideration. We did not create this problem – that is down to the UK and Scottish Governments – but we have to deal with it."
The budget must be in place by February.
Councillor David Stocks, SNP group leader at North Lanarkshire Council, said opposition members had not been given a formal update on the council's position, with details emerging in the media.
Mr Stocks suggested alternatives were being sought by the ruling Labour group with the SNP also working to formulate fresh proposals. He added: "Some of the cuts are so severe I know some Labour members found them just horrific."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article