Thousands of tonnes of radioactive waste from seven defunct nuclear submarines at Rosyth should be dumped in England, the Scottish Government has told a minister at the MoD.
Scotland's Environment Minister, Richard Lochhead, has written to the UK's Under Secretary for Defence, Philip Dunne, saying that waste from dismantling the vessels "should not be stored in Scotland".
Last month, the MoD proposed an old nuclear site at Chapelcross, in Dumfries and Galloway, as a potential store site. But this now looks likely to be dropped as a result of Lochhead's intervention.
That would mean the waste going to one of four sites suggested by the MoD in England: Sellafield nuclear complex in Cumbria; Capenhurst nuclear site in Cheshire; MoD nuclear weapons plants at Aldermaston; and Burghfield in Berkshire.
The MoD has been trying to decide for more than a decade what to do with the seven old subs tied up at Rosyth, as well as 11 at Devonport on the south coast. Its latest plan is to dismantle them at the yards and move the resultant waste elsewhere.
The Sunday Herald revealed in February that taking apart the Rosyth submarines would produce more than 3600 tonnes of radioactive waste. Lower-level wastes will go to the official dump at Drigg near Sellafield, and higher-level wastes are intended for a store at a site yet to be decided.
The proposed store is described as "interim" by the MoD - though designed to last more than 100 years and have the capacity for the waste of nine more vessels still in service. The final aim is to dispose of the waste in an underground repository but no community has agreed to host it.
A Holyrood spokeswoman said: "The Scottish Government has made clear to the MoD this waste should not be stored in Scotland and we will continue to make this case."
Jane Tallents from the Nuclear Submarine Forum, which brings together concerned communities, said: "The UK Government should consider what brings real security for people and stop taking risks and wasting money with nuclear powered submarines."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article