An NHS helpline has been set up for patients of a Scots breast cancer surgeon who is facing separate investigations into his treatment of almost 100 women by the police and the General Medical Council.
Lawyers acting for his former patients allege Glasgow-born Ian Paterson, who worked in the West Midlands, carried out "unnecessary, inappropriate or unregulated" operations while employed by the NHS and private hospitals.
Mr Paterson, who has pledged to fully co-operate with the GMC inquiry, undertook the majority of his work at Solihull Hospital after being taken on by the Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust in 1998.
In a statement, a trust spokesman said it was alerted to concerns surrounding Mr Paterson's practices in 2007 and had instigated a detailed review of breast surgery services provided through Solihull Hospital.
The spokesman added: "This review - identified that a surgical technique for mastectomies used by one of its consultants, Mr Ian Paterson, required closer scrutiny to establish whether it represented best practice.
"An external review highlighted that this was not a usual procedure and that Mr Paterson had not followed guidelines to introduce a new technique.
"This trust's position, after careful consideration, was that the technique was not an approach considered appropriate going forward, and the method was therefore stopped."
Following the inquiry, the trust began a process of identifying patients who may have undergone the procedure to review their current clinical condition.
Mr Paterson was suspended by the GMC last month and was "excluded" from the trust in 2011 due to ongoing concerns among officials, who extended the recall to include all patients who had undergone a mastectomy.
The process of recalling more than 550 patients was completed by March this year.
Dr Aresh Anwar, medical director for Solihull Hospital, said: "We have invited all of Mr Paterson's patients who underwent a mastectomy to see an alternative surgeon for a review of their treatment and care. This programme is now complete.
"We are keen to hear from any patient who may have concerns or further questions and have set up a helpline to ensure that these can be addressed quickly."
Thompsons Solicitors, which is pursuing negligence claims on behalf of patients, said Mr Paterson worked at a number of NHS and private hospitals from 1994.
An investigation into Mr Paterson by the GMC potentially spans up to 700 cases of a procedure that involved leaving some breast tissue behind after a mastectomy, Thompsons said.
It is also alleged that up to 450 women could have had invasive breast surgery when a biopsy might have been sufficient.
In a statement confirming the police inquiry into Mr Paterson, who has not been arrested, Detective Chief Inspector Matt Markham said: "West Midlands Police can confirm it has received a referral from the General Medical Council in relation to allegations about the medical practices of a surgeon who previously worked in Solihull. A criminal inquiry has been launched."
Kashmir Uppal, a senior medical negligence solicitor at Thompsons, said she believed patients had been subjected to needless worry and risk.
Ms Uppal added: "The women who have come forward so far have been very brave. Hopefully, all who have had unnecessary or inappropriate treatment will seek reassurance or justice."
Mr Paterson's registration with the GMC was suspended after an Interim Orders Panel meeting on October 29. A GMC spokesman said: "This means the doctor cannot work as we investigate concerns about his fitness to practise."
In a statement issued on behalf of Mr Paterson, the Medical Defence Union (MDU) said he was co-operating fully with the GMC investigation. A MDU spokeswoman said: "He cannot comment further due to his duty of patient confidentiality and the ongoing investigation."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article