Outraged chocolate fans have claimed that Cadbury's US owners are ruining Easter with a new "cheap chocolate imitation" Creme Egg.
It comes after brand owner Mondelez changed the recipe for the sweet fondant-filled snack so that the shell is made from a "standard, traditional Cadbury milk chocolate" instead of the popular Cadbury Dairy Milk. They were also unhappy after learning there would be five eggs in a pack instead of six.
In the build-up to Easter, Mondelez has got rid of three and six-packs of Creme Eggs and replaced them with a five- pack to sell alongside singles and 12-packs.
The old six-pack cost £3.05 while the new five-pack has a recommended retail price of £2.85.
Some shops are selling the five-packs for £2.
US giant Kraft Foods bought Cadbury in 2010 and its global snacks business under the name of Mondelez International.
Caroline Ferris stated on Facebook "Cheers for ruining Easter!! " while Rachael 'chola' McNally added: "Nooooo cream eggs aren't back, krafts crap cheap chocolate imitation cream eggs have been released."
Sassie Jordan said she is " very disappointed" adding: "I will no longer be buying creme eggs for me or my family! Also whos ever heard of 5 eggs? I am sure eggs come in 6 and 12's...you are ruining a classic treat that everyone enioys at easter. Shame on you!!"
A Mondelez International spokesman said: "The fundamentals of the Cadbury Creme Egg remain exactly the same - delicious milk chocolate and the unique creme centre that consumers love.
"We have always used a range of milk chocolate blends for different products, depending on their shape or consistency. Cadbury Creme Egg now uses a standard, traditional Cadbury milk chocolate for its shell."
The spokesman added that Creme Eggs may have used Cadbury Dairy Milk as the chocolate in its shell in recent years but it has never been flagged as a Cadbury Dairy Milk product.
The now familiar Cadbury Creme Egg first hit the shelves in 1971.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article