WIND FARM operators in Scotland have been paid nearly £6 million over the past 33 days not to generate electricity, more than was paid out for the whole of last year.
Campaigners claim there has never been a longer period of consecutive payments and are continuing to call for the energy regulator to investigate.
The industry has hit back, highlighting comparable payments made to power stations, but both sides agree the problem is a transmission system unfit to export enough power to England.
From April 13 to May 13 this year, some £5.994m was paid out to operators by the National Grid, with all but £2000 going to developments in Scotland. The total for the whole of 2012 was £5.924m.
The latest payments bring the total paid since January 1 to £7.8m and this week alone 20 wind farms have shared a total payout of £2.12m.
The increase in the number of wind farms in Scotland now connected to the Grid may have contributed to the recent excess power supply, but a National Grid spokesman added there could be other reasons for the payments. He said: "The end of March is the start of the summer maintenance period on the electricity transmission network, and parts of the network are taken out of service to allow that essential work to take place which can sometimes create constraints. These outages are carefully planned to minimise their impact on all forms of generation."
Last year, constraint payments were only paid out on two days in April – £37,614 on the 25th and £293,337 on the 26th. This was followed by one day the next month, May 15 when £42,942 was paid out – a total of £373,893.
Stuart Young, of the Caithness Windfarm Information Forum, said: "This was entirely predictable when a regime was adopted which allowed generators to connect to a system that was incapable of carrying the transmission. It is only going to get worse until about 2018 when we might just have a system which allows us to export to England."
Dr Lee Moroney of the Renew-able Energy Foundation, a charity which publishes the data on con-straint payments, said: "Surely it is time the regulator, Ofgem, stepped in to investigate why this is happening and to explain how these costs to the consumer can be justified."
However, Catherine Birkbeck, senior policy manager of Scottish Renewables, said: "To only focus on Scottish wind farms when com- menting on constraint payments is utterly meaningless. During the same time period [April 13 to May 13], Longannet coal-fired power station and Peterhead gas-fired power stations were paid more than £4.4m in constraint payments. In the calendar month of April these two fossil fuel powered generators were given more than £2.8m to not generate electricity while all the wind farms in Scotland received considerably less at £1.54m.
"The point is that constraints on the Grid affect almost all electricity generators, not just wind farms, and it is cheaper to compensate wind farms for lost generation time than other actions to balance the Grid."
A spokesman for Ofgem said: "Generators need to comply with all applicable laws and regulation. For licensed generators this includes the Transmission Constraint Licence Condition (TCLC) which seeks to prevent generators from obtaining an excessive benefit during periods of electricity transmission constraint. We monitor compliance with the TCLC as part of our broader monitoring activities in the wholesale market. In line with our usual practices, we cannot comment on whether a generator is complying with any regulation or legislative requirement."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article