Campaigners have called on MSPs to take action, complaining that sexually-explicit material has now become commonplace.
But Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill will today argue that obscene material is already controlled by law, and that a voluntary code of practice is in place for material that is not illegal.
He will argue the Scottish Government case at Holyrood's Public Petitions Committee, which has been considering the issue for more than a year.
Margaret Forbes, on behalf of Scottish Women against Pornography, petitioned the MSPs in June 2008 with a plea for the Government to ensure magazines and newspapers with sexually-graphic covers were not displayed at children's eye-level or next to youngsters' comics.
She told the committee: "Children see this material from a very young age when they are taken shopping with their mothers.
"Boys grow up believing that this is what girls and women are all about, desperate with sexual encounters with every female they meet, and girls grow up thinking that this is what they should aspire to."
She told of seeing a magazine on sale at a supermarket with an "offensive" photograph on the front - clearly visible even though it was six feet off the ground.
She said: "Pornography is now so common it is like wallpaper in our lives."
But the Scottish Government argues there are already "substantial" legal and voluntary controls on the sale of sexually explicit material.
A spokesman said: "We would be concerned if there was an indication that materials being displayed were illegal and, if that were the case, the matter would be reported to the police for investigation,
"In contrast the material that is referred to in the petition, while it may be offensive to many, is legal to display.
"Despite that, the industry, through the National Federation of Retail Newsagents, has taken a responsible attitude by introducing a voluntary code of practice which urges its members to be sensitive to the concerns of consumers and makes recommendations as to the positioning of these magazines and newspapers in retail outlets."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article