The English language is evolving at a faster rate now than at any other time in history because of social media and instant messaging, according to an expert.
Professor John Sutherland from University College London is the UK's leading English expert, and has led a study into common social media and "text speak" terms that found most parents were baffled by the language used by their children.
According to the study there was now a "seismic generational gap" between the older and younger generations when it came to how modern informal language was used.
Modern terms such as "fleek" and "bae" were found to be the most commonly confused by parents, with just 10per cent of the 2,000 surveyed being able to identify the true meaning of "bae" - a term of affection.
86per cent of parents who took part in the survey said they felt teenagers spoke an entirely different language on social media sites such as Twitter and Facebook.
"Fleek" - which means looking good - came top of the list of terms parents did not understand, with 43per cent selecting it as a term they did not know.
This was ahead of FOMO (fear of missing out) and bae, both of which were selected by 40per cent of parents.
Popular social media acronyms ICYMI (in case you missed it), TBT (throwback Thursday) and NSFW (not safe for work) also made the list of terms parents failed to understand.
Prof Sutherland said: "The limitation of characters on old handsets were a key factor in the rise of acronyms in text messaging such as TXT, GR8 and M8.
"However, technological evolution has meant that these words are now effectively extinct from the text speak language and are seen as 'antique text speak'.
He added that the rise of emojis could be the next phase in language and communication
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article