FORMER pop star Gary Glitter has been arrested and questioned by police investigating the Jimmy Savile scandal.
The singer was arrested at his home in central London at 7.15am yesterday before being taken to a nearby police station.
Police have not yet revealed why the singer, whose real name is Paul Gadd, was arrested, saying only it is part of their Savile investigation.
The ageing rocker was spotted leaving Charing Cross police station shortly before 5pm yesterday.
A Scotland Yard spokesman said: "Officers working on Operation Yewtree have today arrested a man in his 60s in connection with the investigation. The man, from London, was arrested at approximately 7.15am on suspicion of sexual offences and has been taken into custody at a London police station.
"The individual falls under the strand of the investigation we have termed 'Savile and others'."
The spokesman added that Gadd had been released on bail to return in mid-December pending further inquiries.
Savile, who died last year at the age of 84, has been described as one of the most prolific sex offenders in recent UK history.
Scotland Yard detectives are dealing with 300 alleged victims and are following more than 400 lines of inquiry.
Gadd's arrest came as the chairman of the BBC Trust, Lord Patten, said he was dedicated to finding out the truth about the scandal that has engulfed the corporation, vowing there would be "no covering our backs".
He claimed the BBC's reputation was on the line and it had risked squandering the public's trust.
Speaking of Savile's apparent decades of criminality, he added: "Can it really be the case no-one knew what he was doing? Did some turn a blind eye to criminality? Did some prefer not to follow up their suspicions because of this criminal's popularity and place in the schedules? Were reports of criminality put aside or buried?
"Even those of us who were not there at the time are inheritors of the shame."
He also apologised "unreservedly" to the abused women who spoke to the BBC's Newsnight programme but did not have their stories told when the report was axed.
The BBC chairman said the two independent inquiries set up – one into the Newsnight report, the other into the BBC's culture and practices in the years Savile worked there – must get to the truth of what happened.
He said: "Now my immediate priority is to get to the bottom of the Savile scandal and to make any and every change necessary in the BBC to learn the lessons from our independent investigations."
Labour deputy leader Harriet Harman added there needed to be an over-arching independent inquiry into the Savile case.
She claimed the criminal justice system too often leads victims to believe they will not be believed if they come forward with allegations of sexual abuse, adding: "If there is an assumption you won't be believed then you are less likely to come and if you do come forward and then you meet that culture of dis-belief, then it is going to be swept under the carpet."
However, Justice Secretary Chris Grayling said he was not convinced by the case for an immediate judge-led inquiry of the kind she proposed.
He said: "There is always a danger if you set up a very substantial inquiry process of that kind that it takes much longer to get to the truth."
There were also claims yesterday that former BBC director general Mark Thompson's office was twice alerted about the Savile abuse claims, despite his insistence he had no personal knowledge of the allegations.
Reports suggested his aides were told of the claims of abuse on BBC premises in May and September but his spokesman denied the claims were ever passed on to Mr Thompson.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article