Oscar Pistorius offered 375,000 South African rand (£21,000) to the family of girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp after he killed her, but they rejected it because they did not want "blood money", a court has been told.
Chief prosecutor Gerrie Nel also yesterday referred to separate monthly payments of 6,000 rand (£340) the Olympic and Paralympic athlete apparently made to Ms Steenkamp's parents after they asked for help, during Pistorius's sentencing hearing in Pretoria for her culpable homocide. Mr Nel said those payments would be returned in full.
The revelations emerged while Mr Nel was cross-examining a social worker over what Pistorius' punishment should be for shooting his girlfriend on Valentine's Day, 2013.
Annette Vergeer told the court in Pretoria that the Olympic and Paralympic runner should be placed under house arrest, rather than sent to prison, after he was found guilty of culpable homicide.
Ms Vergeer said South African jails are violent and overcrowded, and the double amputee would be under duress because of his disability and fragile mental state resulting from the night he fired four times through a toilet door in his home, killing Ms Steenkamp.
Pistorius claimed he mistook her for an intruder, and denied prosecution assertions that he shot her during an argument.
Ms Vergeer said Pistorius has the potential to be a productive member of society again and a sentence of house arrest and work at a school for disabled children would be more appropriate.
The hearing was adjourned until today.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article