A leading land reform expert has launched a withering attack on the SNP's record in office.
Until recently Professor Jim Hunter had been advising Scottish ministers on future action on land reform.
In an extraordinary broadside, the Highland historian said six years under the SNP had left Scotland stuck with the "most concentrated, most inequitable, most unreformed and most undemocratic land ownership system in the entire developed world".
Mr Hunter, who is sympathetic to independence, stood down as vice-chairman of the Land Reform Review Group (LRRG) in April for personal reasons. But, when asked about speculation the group is to be restructured, Mr Hunter criticised the group's interim report, and said the Government had to be involved directly in its work.
There should be a commitment to legislation in 2014/15 on community land ownership, he said, adding that the process of getting land into community hands needed to be simpler.
Ministers had to get serious about giving tenant farmers a right to buy their farms, he said. "Danish farmers got a right to buy more than 200 years ago. How much longer are Scottish tenant farmers to be denied a similar right?"
Mr Hunter added: "There's precious little that's socially just about a Scotland where fewer than 1000 people own more than half the country and where tenant farmers, as the LRRG has discovered, are frightened to speak out for fear of repercussions from their lairds."
A Scottish Government spokesman said it was committed to land reform. He said: "We will also hold a review of agricultural tenancies, and have provided a £6 million Scottish Land Fund for 2012/15 to help communities buy their land.
"That support for local groups looking to exercise their right to buy has flourished under this administration, with a total of 127 community bodies formed under existing land reform legislation since May 2007 and all applications where a right to buy has been triggered have been approved."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article