Ben Collins, the racing driver who was The Stig on Top Gear for eight years, has said that the BBC show could thrive without Jeremy Clarkson.
The stuntman fell out with the broadcaster when it launched legal action - which it failed to win - over his decision to reveal his identity and publish his autobiography.
Collins told Radio Times magazine that the embattled presenter was not supportive of him in his own clash with the corporation.
And he said that the BBC2 show could continue to succeed without him.
"Top Gear has achieved huge status and Jeremy has certainly been part of that because he's got such a big personality... he's an unstoppable force.
"But fans of the programme love it for lots of different reasons. Jeremy is certainly one of them, but not the only one," Collins, who was The Stig until 2011, said.
"The Bond franchise.... changes and moves forward. Top Gear will always continue.... It will carry on and continue to be successful because millions of people watch it."
Collins said that it had become harder for the show "to reinvent itself", as it was "possibly starting to strain under the weight of its own success".
He said: "Things will evolve one way or the other. I don't think it can be only anchored in one person."
He added: "I was there for eight years but it came to a natural conclusion. I handed in my notice and had discussions with the BBC and they decided to go to court, which was a real shame and not what I wanted. Was Jeremy supportive? No, he wasn't. We haven't spoken since.
"But I get on really well now with the guy that hired me (executive producer and Clarkson's close friend Andy Wilman) and I'm really delighted about that."
Meanwhile, Perry McCarthy, who was The Stig from 2002 to 2003, said that Top Gear without Clarkson would take "the fire out of it" and "won't work".
"I think you're going to have a diluted product. I don't think it will have the value that it did, here and overseas", he said.
"And God help any soul who takes his place, because that's like signing up for your own firing squad. The only person who could take it on would be somebody who has nothing to lose."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article