MEDICAL staff have been urged not to lend their names to alternative health therapies after the doctor parents of singer Darius Campbell-Danesh gave glowing internet testimonials to a US man who claimed he could cure cancer.
Robert Young, 63, has been charged with theft and "treating the sick without a certificate" in California.
However, GP Avril Campbell and retired gastroenterologist Booth Danesh, who are the parents of the singer and West End stage actor, appeared in a video praising Mr Young who claims to be able to cure cancer with avocado juice.
Dr Campbell, who works at Glasgow's Beatson cancer centre, was recovering from breast cancer when she visited Mr Young's alternative retreat outside San Diego. However, a charitable trust that aims to help people make sense of scientific and medical research said yesterday that doctors were vulnerable to being targeted to endorse controversial treatments.
Emily Jesper, assistant director of Sense about Science, whilst not commenting on Mr Young's case said: "When living with a debilitating condition, particularly if there is no cure or current treatments aren't providing relief - there is a potential market in false hope.
"We see it time and again. People with chronic diseases offered unlicensed stem cell treatments, and expensive unorthodox cancer 'cures'.
"What these situations have in common is the layer of respectability added by involvement of 'international experts'.
"Medics and scientists need to make sure they don't unwittingly become part of this problem. But rather, give critical scrutiny of extraordinary claims."
Britain's leading academic critic of alternative medicine, Edzard Ernst, said: "Cancer patients are understandably desperate and thus all too often victims of charlatans who promise a side-effect free cure.
"However, an alternative cancer cure does not and will never exist. If a therapy looks vaguely promising, it will be tested and, if effective, adopted by conventional oncology."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article