FORMER Radio DJ Suzie McGuire's husband had to lock himself in a spare room at their home because he was so scared of his wife's attacks, a court has heard.
Accountant Derek Mitchell made the claim as he gave evidence at Paisley Sheriff Court, where he is on trial accused of repeatedly attacking the former Clyde One drivetime presenter, during their volatile relationship.
However, Mr Mitchell denied in court yesterday that he assaulted Ms McGuire and said her attacks on him left him in fear of his life.
The court heard last week that the allegations against Ms McGuire are on hold until Mr Mitchell's trial has been completed.
Mr Mitchell claims they took place after Ms McGuire had gone for an abortion while she was pregnant with his child.
The 35-year-old, who lived in Australia before meeting Ms McGuire, said he returned to the country early on in their relationship to visit friends.
He said upon his return to Scotland, Ms McGuire told him she been pregnant with his child but had the pregnancy terminated.
He said the development made him feel pressured into marrying her as he wanted children and she did not want to have another child out of wedlock.
Mr Mitchell said: "On at least five occasions I've gone to stay in hotels because I didn't feel comfortable going to sleep.
"A dozen times at least, I've locked myself in a back room of the house and slept on a couch to protect myself. I was in fear of my life."
The accountant said he was left scared to sleep in his bed after an incident while staying at the Cameron House Hotel by Loch Lomond in summer 2011.
They spent the evening drinking after a wedding with boxing promoter Barry Hughes and former Rangers goalkeeper Andy Goram before going upstairs, the court heard. Mr Mitchell added: "I told Suzie I was going back to the room. I went to sleep.
"The next thing I know I'm being dragged off the bed, punched, kicked and stamped on.
"I was half asleep, I was probably drunk, I was in a state of shock.
"I just went in to a ball to try and protect myself and she eventually stopped.
"I was gutted. We had to leave the hotel without anyone knowing and I was left with some quite bad injuries. To be woken up in that fashion is horrific."
Mr Mitchell told the court that he was left with two black eyes and a broken rib. He said Ms McGuire had attacked because she could not get into the room and had to get another key from the reception.
When asked by his lawyer, Billy Lavelle, how that left him feeling about his marriage, Mr Mitchell replied that the thought of being a part-time father to their children would have been "unbelievably difficult."
He said the incident had "a very big effect" on him and said he would always try and avoid conflict with Suzie after that. He explained: "I'm very well aware of the main reason I'm here. Suzie is a terrorist. She has terrorised me for nearly two years and used, unforgivably, the children as a weapon."
He told the jury he had never assaulted his wife. He was cross-examined about earlier court claims by TV presenter Michelle McManus and Ms McGuire that he had called his wife a slut at a hotel in Bishopton, Renfrewshire, in 2011. He denied using the words, but said she had been drinking heavily and flirting with army cadets, embarrassing him.
He also denied claims he had dug the fingers of his nails into her hands. He admitted he broke his wife's finger on the day of the Eaglesham Fair, in their home village, in 2011, but said it happened as he tried to stop her attacking him. The trial continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article