SCOTLAND'S national theatre is to tackle the independence debate head-on with two new plays which focus on the identity of Scotland and its future.
They are the first announced shows from an ambitious first season for the National Theatre of Scotland's new artistic director Laurie Sansom.
In a large touring show, The Great Don't Know Show, two leading writers and directors, David Greig and David MacLennan, will curate a series of scenes, songs, skits, rants and dramas which will take both sides of the referendum debate and all points inbetween.
Acclaimed Scottish playwright Greig, whose version of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory opened in London this week, is in the Yes camp.
MacLennan, a veteran of Scottish theatre whose stage history includes both Wildcat and 7:84 theatre as well as the successful Play, Pie and a Pint in Glasgow's Oran Mor venue, comes from the No camp.
The other new show for 2014, Rantin, by Kieran Hurley, and featuring several actors and singer-songwriters, will look at the variety of identities in Scotland and will also tour nationally.
A full NTS programme will be announced later this year, but Sansom said he is also adapting a Muriel Spark novel and is working on a major new Scottish drama.
Sansom, 40, originally from Kent, has also appointed three associate directors, Graham McLaren, Cora Bissett and Davey Anderson, who will be in position from January.
In his first interview since moving to Glasgow in March, he said: "What [David and David] wanted to do is find a format where a lot of viewpoints, some very partisan, can be given a forum and a structure.
"So we are going to be commissioning a lot of artists to write sketches, songs, rants, moments, statements and that will provide them with a menu. When they turn up in different communities they can shape that evening's entertainment to where they are, according to what people have sent in, or posted online."
"Both shows will use innovative ways of using social media so the whole nation can engage. Even if it is coming nowhere near you, you can contribute."
Sansom said the NTS itself cannot and will not take a position on the referendum, and he himself is firmly in the "don't know" camp.
He said: "I think art that is being very black and white, trying to harangue an audience, isn't actually very interesting art anyway.
"The artists we are getting involved aren't interested in that anyway – they will be asking the questions, and the challenges, and not necessarily making the audience think one way or the other. That's the politicians' job. It's our job to throw some questions up in the air."
When asked whether pro-independence writer and artist Alasdair Gray, who caused controversy with his views of English people appointed in Scotland as being "settlers or colonists", would be involved, Sansom said: "I don't know. It's up to David and Dave."
On Rantin, he said it explores the plurality of identities in Scotland and added: "It's a brilliant piece to take on the road to start next year's programme and to start a debate and to interrogate what national identity means."
On the topic of Gray's comments, Sansom, who is succeeding Vicky Featherstone in the post, said he had been made to feel "really welcome" in the position. He said he was enjoying living in Scotland.
Sansom added: "I have not experienced any hostility to my nationality.
"I don't know whether I will, and actually I feel I can join a debate about the work, and the values of the work.
"I don't think I can defend my position as an English person running the company, because that is who I am and that's not going to change, and I did not appoint myself."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article