SCOTS' poor skills with medieval weapons lead to the country's worst ever defeat in battle, experts have claimed.
History experts have recreated a key part of the 1513 Battle of Flodden to determine why Scotland suffered a crushing defeat at the hands of the English.
They found the Scots were unable to use their new 18ft pikes effectively, as they charged down a hill in the rain. This meant the English, with shorter polearms, could cut them apart. The battle ended with around 10,000 Scots dead, including King James IV and most of the country's nobility.
Battlefield archaeology expert Dr Tony Pollard of Glasgow University recreated the conditions of the battle during a reenactment at the weekend.
Around 20 "pikemen" were made to advance down a hill similar to the one the Scots army would have done in 1513. He found the pikemen bunched up and broke their lines - meaning the weapons would be hopeless against the massed ranks of the English.
James IV, the "Renaissance King", had equipped his army at the last minute with 18ft pikes normally found in continental Europe, which would have been unfamiliar to the Scottish troops.
Dr Pollard said the men would have had little practice with the new weapon: "Your traditional Scottish spear was eight feet long, these were 18ft long. I tried to handle one of them, they're incredibly cumbersome."
The 500-year anniversary of the battle will take place on September 9.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article