A CONGREGATION has been divided over the treatment of a parish priest who was suspended over his claims that there is a culture of homosexual bullying in the Catholic Church.
Parishioners turning up at John Ogilvie RC church in High Blantyre yesterday were given copies of a letter by Bishop Joseph Toal, who is in temporary charge of Motherwell diocese and suspended Father Matthew Despard last November. That action followed the allegations made by Father Despard in a self-published book.
In the letter, the bishop said Father Despard had questioned his authority to act as he has done, and he urged supporters of the suspended priest "to prevail upon him to obey my instructions".
Some of Father Despard's supporters yesterday described the Bishop's intervention as ill-considered and one parishioner accused other priests of wanting the clergyman to be "destroyed" in the wake of his allegations.
Josephine Greenhorn, 55, who has worshipped at John Ogilvie for 14 years, said she felt Bishop Toal had "made things worse" by issuing the letter, and asked: "Is it part of the 'canonical process' to issue public attacks like this?"
She said: "The extent of the division [within the congregation] is dreadful. The Christmas vigil is usually a blaze of colour but it was more like a funeral mass.
"Everyone has been affected by this. Some of us know Father Despard's parents, who are parishioners within the diocese. They are ordinary Catholics. How must they feel?
"There are views on both sides but I want this investigated speedily. If this was an ordinary judicial process within a court then Bishop Toal's letter would possibly have been a contempt of court.
"Father Despard has obeyed Bishop Toal's instruction not to speak publicly about the matter, so why has the bishop seen fit to issue this letter now? Father Despard is not even allowed to respond. I believe some priests in the diocese want Fr Despard destroyed."
She added that, while she did not believe Father Despard had "gone around everything in the right way", most people wanted the truth to be brought out fairly and not through a "witch-hunt".
The bishop's letter was to be read out at every parish in the diocese at the weekend.
In it, he mentions "further concern or anxiety for those named or referred to in this book, both clergy and laity", and said it was necessary to continue the canonical process initiated by the former Bishop of Motherwell, Joseph Devine, before he stepped down from that role.
Bishop Toal spoke of the "distress and pain" felt particularly over the last year in respect of revelations about sexual misconduct and abusive behaviour by some Scottish clergy.
He added: "Further allegations, and the subsequent extensive reporting, may well arise and we will continue to suffer with those whose pain is made known to us and to carry a heavy cross as Catholics in Scotland." It was wrong, he added, to "assume or [to] imply" all priests were suspect because of the failings of a few.
Outside John Ogilvie RC Church yesterday, one parishioner said Father Despard "had brought disgrace upon the church" but a supporter said: "It's a disgrace what has happened. You're trying to bring up your kids to be honest and truthful but the church is just trying to brush things under the carpet, so you're not teaching your kids correctly."
Helen Ann Hawkins, who has organised a petition to remove the priest's suspension, has written a response to the bishop, saying: "I see an injustice being carried out against Father Despard.
"If Father Despard's requests had been acted on to permit himself and his accompanying lawyer to speak with the church authorities, then we would not be in the position we find ourselves in at present. This would alleviate the further pain and distress caused within the Church."
The Catholic Church did not respond to a request for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article