A GROUP of climbers are clambering to discover if a Scottish mountain really is a Munro.
Graham Jackson, John Barnard and Myrddyn Phillips of G and J Surveys will take on Knight's Peak in the Cuillin Mountains of Skye next month to discover if it is 3002ft high, as is accepted by mountaineers.
Mountains in Scotland are only called a Munro if they are higher than 3000ft. Although Knight's Peak is registered as 3002ft in current Ordinance Survey maps, the measurement could be incorrect by up to six metres.
The height of Knight's Peak - which is a particularly jagged mountain with a number of sheer drops - was measured by a technique called photogrammetry, which converts aerial photographs into 3D images to predict the mountain's height without actually climbing it.
But G and J Surveys will lumber up the mountain with a Leica Geosystems Viva GS15 Professional receiver that uses GPS and satellites to narrow the correct height down to an error margin of just 5cm.
Myrddyn said although measuring mountains was fun, it was important to have precise measurements.
He said: "It's a hobby that is spent out of the love and appreciation that we get from the hillwalking, but it also stems out for the need to get accurate data.
"We will feed our findings into something called the Database of British and Irish hills, and that has detailed data for around some 7000-odd hills.
"What our findings could do is potentially affect the official number of Munros out there.
"What we've got to be careful of is the kind of tricky terrain that we have to climb. We don't want to go up there in high winds, so we just have to hope we can get up there in the time that we're up in Skye.
"This will probably be the most difficult mountain survey ever conducted in Britain."
The three climbers will also have another problem when they climb the mountain, as it has two tops and it is unknown which one is higher than the other.
Climbers who have made it to the top report that when on one, the other looks higher, and vice versa.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article