A CHARITY has claimed planned welfare visits by police to home-based sex workers are little more than thinly-disguised raids.
Scot-Pep, which aims to protect the rights of people in the industry, said Operation Lingle will intimidate women in the sex industry and is out of step with public opinion.
Police Scotland confirmed a range of agencies are involved in talks about the new strategy and said it was not intended to criminalise or intimidate sex workers but would offer support.
The force denied claims from Scot-Pep that the pilot scheme would encourage members of the public to report neighbours who they believe may be sex workers.
The charity said that although it had been involved in discuss-ions, its concerns about Operation Lingle had been dismissed.
Board member Nadine Stott said: "In private conversations with the police, Operation Lingle has been presented to Scot-Pep as a progressive, and welfare based policy. However sex workers' serious concerns were ignored."
She said the policy gave the welfare of sex workers no more than token consideration and added that "intimidating" home visits in Glasgow were to be rolled out across the country.
Prostitution is legal in Scotland, but if more than one worker operates from the same premises that is classed as a brothel, rendering it illegal.
"Where sex workers are working alone, they will be intimidated. Where two or more sex workers are working together for safety - a set up that is currently criminalised - those sex workers will be forced to choose between a safer workplace and prosecution," Ms Stott said.
She said the visits, combined with increased online surveillance of sex workers, would undermine harm reduction and destroy trust between sex workers and police - already undermined by a series of raids on saunas.
Scot-Pep will now seek a meeting with Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill while calling on Police Scotland to scrap the policy.
Green MSP Patrick Harvie said he was concerned about the impact on a vulnerable group of people as well as the wider civil liberties implications."I would urge the Scottish Government and Police Scotland to reconsider this operation urgently. Our priority should be protecting sex workers against violence and exploitation, not intimidating them and using police intelligence to identify and harass them," he said.
However DCI Ruth Gilfillan, of the National Rape Taskforce and Human Trafficking Unit, who has been involved in the development of Operation Lingle said it was a pilot programme which would help identify those at risk and offer support to people working in the off-street sex industry. "The visits would involve a support worker with a police officer and the main aim is to improve welfare and build trust," she said.
"It is disappointing that the aims and objectives of the multi-agency approach appear to have been misinterpreted. Police Scotland remains committed to working with all of our partners including Scot-Pep."
Other agencies involved in developing the pilot also defended it. Katie Cosgrove, gender-based violence programme manager for NHS Health Scotland, said: "Given the relative invisibility of this group, and the vulnerability they experience, we believe that many may not be aware of, or able to access, existing services, and that a proactive approach is required to reach them."
Nicola McPhee, head of Community Justice at Commun-ity Safety Glasgow said: "This partnership approach provides an opportunity for our services to engage with women involved in indoor prostitution and provide immediate harm reduction advice as well as ongoing support where necessary."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article