MOVES to introduce a "named person" for every child in Scotland would help prevent youngsters from slipping through the net, a charity has said.
Anne Houston, chief executive of Children 1st, spoke out following the publication of a serious case review, which highlighted how chances were missed by child protection agencies to intervene in the case of Daniel Pelka.
Daniel, from Coventry, died from a head injury in March last year after suffering months of cruelty and emotional abuse at the hands of his mother Magdelena Luczak and former soldier Mariusz Krezolek.
The pair, both originally from Poland, were jailed for a minimum of 30 years each at Birmingham Crown Court earlier this year.
The review found Daniel was at times rendered "invisible" in the eyes of health professionals, school staff and social workers. It said Luczak and her partner Krezolek, "misled and deceived" a host of child protection agencies by spinning a "web of lies" to conceal systematic abuse.
The report also highlighted the fact that Daniel was never individually spoken to about his home life, without his mother or stepfather present.
Proposals in the Children and Young People (Scotland) Bill to provide a named person for every child have been criticised by some, with the Faculty of Advocates saying the move could potentially breach the European Convention on Human Rights. But Anne Houston, chief executive of Children 1st, said: "Deaths like Daniel's remind us why the principle behind the named person measure in the Children and Young People Bill is a sound one as it aims to prevent children slipping through the net.
"This sort of case is potentially where the named person could come in, acting as first point of contact for a child and all the professionals coming into contact with him or her. They would collate and have access to all the information and be encouraged to put the child at the centre."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article