A campaign has been launched against privatisation of Royal Mail, which supporters fear could end the obligation to charge the same for postal services throughout the UK and bring in a £1 stamp.
The Save Our Royal Mail campaigners claim the countryside would be left isolated.
And they fear that, as it costs more than the price of a stamp to deliver to a rural address, the Universal Service Obligation would be at risk.
They also say that, despite assurances to the contrary, the postal services regulator Ofcom is working to determine the real cost of deliveries to rural areas. Campaigners fear stamp prices would shoot up if they are no longer regulated and VAT may eventually apply.
In a statement, the campaigners said: "Small businesses will suffer. For many small businesses, especially those in rural areas, there is often no alternative to the Royal Mail. Suffering from high energy bills, businesses can ill-afford to see the cost of using the postal service rocket."
A website has been set up offering to email a letter to MPs and the chance to sign the campaign's petition.
Campaign director Mario Dunn said: "We have learnt the prospectus group within the Royal Mail are working feverishly and people in the know in banks and the city have said that a potential initial public offering is being lined up for September.
"It will mean that a certain percentage of Royal Mail will be offered up to investors."
He added: "We want to take our message to the politicians: do not rush headlong into a sell-off if you cannot guarantee a privatised Royal Mail will constrain its prices and provide these services at their current level."
Ofcom said it had no powers to dismantle the USO or cut rural services.
Meanwhile, a Royal Mail spokesman said it was "pure speculation" to suggest that stamp prices could reach £1 in the next few years.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article