CHIEF Constable Stephen House has expressed regret over delays to an inquiry into police conduct over the Lockerbie investigation.
The Justice for Megrahi campaign claims police covered up evidence that would have helped Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al Megrahi's defence.
The group says the evidence relates to a potential breach of airport security at Heathrow, the unusual composition of a circuit board used to make the bomb and Maltese shopkeeper Tony Gauci's identification testimony.
Last year, progress on investigating these complaints was promised in weeks, but more than five months later nothing has been done as it would clash with a "live investigation" in Libya on the 1988 atrocity which claimed 270 lives.
Chief Constable Stephen House has written to Holyrood's Justice Committee, saying: "It would be a matter of regret if any officer has communicated an inaccurate expectation of the timescale through which these matters would progress.
"I can assure you that the allegations made by the Justice for Megrahi group are being investigated thoroughly and as expeditiously as possible."
Mr House said Detective Superintendent Stuart Johnstone has been on the case full-time since the retirement of Deputy Chief Constable Patrick Shearer but could not take action until after the conflict with the live investigation had ended. This was estimated to be the end of March, but this could not be guaranteed.
But Christine Grahame, convener of the Justice Committee and a member of Justice for Megrahi, said: "I am very disappointed to learn that not only were we given the wrong date last year, we are now being told that the end of March is not set in stone. This is frankly contemptuous of the Justice Committee."
The committee has asked the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission whether it has received any application for a fresh review from the family of al Megrahi since his death.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article